This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 153A: Assessment-Search-Approval of prescribed authority-Approvals in 30 cases rushed through on same day Difficult to believe that Additional Commissioner considered all proposals and accompanying draft assessment orders within a few minutes or even a couple of hours-Approval need not resemble reasoned decision-But should reflect minimal application of mind-Absence of valid and prior approval vitiates assessment-Non-application of mind-Tribunal right in quashing assessments-Order of Tribunal affirmed-No substantial question of law. [S. 132,153D, 260A]

PCIT v. Citron Infraprojects Ltd (2026) 485 ITR 670 (Bom)(HC) PCIT v. Hellos Mercantile Ltd 2026) 485 ITR 670 (Bom)(HC) Shri Vallabh Pittle South West Industries Ltd 2026) 485 ITR 670 (Bom)(HC) SVP Global Textiles Ltd (2026) 485 ITR 670 (Bom)(HC)

S. 153A: Assessment-Search-Recording of satisfaction note by Assessing Officer of person in respect of whom search conducted Mandatory-Settlement commission-Admission-In absence thereof, jurisdictional Assessing Officer of “other person” cannot assume jurisdiction solely on basis of material sent to him by Assessing Officer of searched person-Reassessment-Assessment of third person-Non obstante provisions-Assessing Officer cannot directly invoke sections 147 and 148 merely because numerous assessees’ names have been unearthed during search and whom it believes have evaded tax-Reassessment under general provisions permissible on basis of material collected post-search from any other independent source-Information regarding payment of cash received post-search on basis of admission before Settlement Commission Information sufficient to reopen the assessment-to trigger action under sections 147 and 148-Held, Department was justified in reopening assessment on information received subsequently-Assessment of third person-No satisfaction note recorded by Assessing Officer of entity subjected to search-Material merely supplied to jurisdictional Assessing Office of “other person”-Not sufficient-What cannot be done directly cannot be done indirectly-Circular No. 24 of 2015 dated 31-12-2015(2016) 380 ITR 32 (St). [S. 147, 148, 153C, 245C, 245D 260A]

Paras Chandreshbhai Koticha v. ITO (2026) 485 ITR 628 (Guj)(HC)

S. 153: Assessment-Reassessment-Limitation-Order giving effect to direction of Tribunal-Limitation for assessment to be reckoned from that date-High Court holding assessment barred by limitation-SLP of revenue dismissed.[S.153(2A), Art. 136]

CIT (IT) v. Qualcomm Incorporated (2026) 485 ITR 347 (SC) Editorial: CIT (IT) v. Qualcomm Incorporated, (2024) 470 ITR 598 (Delhi) HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Limitation-Assessing Officer having two days to issue notice under section 148 after receiving reply filed by assessee-Assessing Officer having seven days to pass an order for issue of notice Period expired on 16-6-2022-Order passed under section 148A(d) beyond period of limitation-Notice issued beyond three years-Approval to be by Principal Chief Commissioner or Principal Director General or where there is no such authority, by Chief Commissioner or Director General-Notice issued with approval of Commissioner (E)-Issued without approval of authority specified under section Notice is set aside. [S. 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), 151(ii), Art. 226, Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020.]

Communist Party of India (Marxist) v. ITO (2026) 485 ITR 775 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Assessing Officer must first make inquiry with regard to information available after obtaining sanction from competent authority and thereafter, issue initial notice under clause (b) of section 148A calling for explanation on basis of which to decide whether case fit for reopening-Assessing Officer had issued initial notice under clause (b) as if inquiry is to be conducted under clause (a)-Notice bad in law.[S 148, 148A(b),148A(d), Art. 226]

Chetak Nandkumar Gandhi v. ITO (206) 485 ITR 762 (Guj)(HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Search and seizure-Assessment of third person-Limitation-Order under section 148A(d) and proceedings pursuant to second notice issued under section 148 beyond period of limitation invalid and set aside.[S. 132, 147, 148, 148A(b),148A(d), 153C, Art. 226]

Pratishtha Garg v. ACIT (2026) 485 ITR 189 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Faceless assessment-Jurisdictional officer-Inquiry by Assessing Officer and passing of order on prima facie conclusion that it is fit case for reopening-Not available in Scheme-Scheme is unambiguous and plain in language-If Scheme applied to new procedure for reassessment, it would amount to alteration by adding procedure not intended by Legislature Notices for reassessment issued by jurisdictional Assessing Officer and not faceless Assessing Officer-Valid. [S. 120, 124, 127, 130, 144B, 148, 148A, 151A Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020-e-Assessment of Income Escaping Assessment Scheme, 2022-Notification No. 18 of 2022 dated 29-3-2022.]

Snehdham Trust v. ACIT (And Other Petitions) (2026) 485 ITR 24 (Guj)(HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Faceless assessment-Jurisdictional officer-manner Notices issued and proceedings conducted by the jurisdictional officer-Not sustainable-Direction that the order was subject to the outcome of special leave petitions preferred by the Department against the decision of the courts on the same issue before the Supreme Court.[S. 147, 148, 148A(b) 148A(d),151A, Art. 226]

Tecumseh Products India Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2026) 485 ITR 12 (Telangana)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Capital gains-Capital asset or stock-in-trade-Transferred to subsidiary-Exemption granted-Withdrawal of exemption-Proceedings under section 155(7B) to be within a period of four years from the end of previous relevant year in which conversion was made Held, initiation of proceedings beyond four years would be barred by limitation-Reassessment notice and order disposing the objection quashed.[S. 45, 47(iv), 47A, 144B, 148, 154, 155(7B), Art. 226]

Express News Papers Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (2026) 485 ITR 161 (Mad)(HC)

S. 139: Return of income-Central Board of Direct Taxes-Circulars-Compulsory audit of accounts-Circular extending “specified date” for submission of audit report-Due date-CBDT directed to issue circular to extend “due date” for filing of return. [S. 44AB, 119, Art. 226]

Income-tax Bar Association v. UOI (2026) 485 ITR 381 (Guj)(HC)