This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 68: Cash credits-Alleged bogus sales-Notice issued to customers was returned unserved-Order of Tribunal affirming the addition is affirmed. [S,260A]

Vaishnavi Agro v. ITO (2026) 310 Taxman 400 (Jharkhand)(HC)

S. 68 : Cash credits-Long-term capital gains-Sale of shares-Cash credits-Information from Investigation Wing-Penny stock-Bogus accommodation entries-SLP of revenue dismissed.[S. 10(38),45,68, Art. 136]

PCIT v. Sanjaykumar Damjibhai Gangani (2026) 310 Taxman 667 (SC) Editorial: PCIT v. Sanjaykumar Damjibhai Gangani (2025) 178 taxmann.com 276 (Guj)(HC)

S. 56 : Income from other sources-Buy-back of shares at a price lower than fair market value-Transaction was not purchase of shares simpliciter, but buy-back of its own shares amounting to reduction of share capital and, therefore, provisions of section 56(2)(x) read with Rule 11UA were not applicable-Addition was deleted-Order of Tribunal affirmed. [S. 56(2)(x),260A, R.11UA, Companies Act, S.68]

PCIT v. Globe Capital Market Ltd. (2026) 310 Taxman 386 /487 ITR 744 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 40(a)(i): Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Non-resident-Royalty-Fees for Technical Services-Lease Line Charges-Remittances towards IPLC/bandwidth services to a US company without deduction of tax at source, since Explanations 4 to 6 to section 9(1)(vi) inserted by Finance Act, 2012 were prospective in operation and payments were not chargeable to tax in India-disallowance under section 40(a)(i) and action under sections 201(1) and 201(1A) could not be sustained-DTAA-India-USA. [S.9(1)(vi), 9(1)(vii), 195, 201(1),201(IA), Art. 12]

Cognizant Technology Solutions India (P.) Ltd v. ITO (TDS) [2026] 310 Taxman 668 /491 ITR 109 (Mad)(HC)

S. 37(1): Business expenditure-Payment to LIC-Contractual obligation recorded in partnership deed to provide post-retirement benefits to an employee, who was also a partner-liability actually existing at time of payment and not a contingent liability-allowable as deduction. [S. 260A]

Brahmayya v. Dy. CIT (2026) 310 Taxman 276 (Mad)(HC)

S. 37(1): Business expenditure-Guarantees given for repayment of loans raised by its subsidiaries and their business associates-In absence of any supporting material-Not allowable as business expenditure-Order of High Court affirmed. [Art. 136]

United Breweries Ltd. v. CIT (2026) 310 Taxman 180 (SC) Editorial :CIT v. United Breweries Ltd(2010) 190 taxman92/ 321 ITR 546/ 231 CTR 28 (Karn)(HC)

S. 36(1)(vii): Bad debt-Advance for simply helping business associate-Advance for issue of shares-Order of High Court affirmed-Appeal dismissed.[Art. 136]

United Breweries Ltd. v. CIT (2026) 310 Taxman 180 (SC) Editorial :CIT v. United Breweries Ltd(2010) 190 taxman92/ 321 ITR 546/ 231 CTR 28 (Karn)(HC)

S. 32: Depreciation-Additional depreciation-Put to use for less than 180 days-Statute provides for 50 per cent of additional depreciation in that year, and the remaining 50 per cent shall be allowed in the subsequent assessment year-Order of Tribunal set asdie. [S.260A]

Wheels India Ltd. v. Asst. CIT (LTU Appeals) (2026) 310 Taxman 168 (Mad)(HC)

S. 32 : Depreciation-Lease transactions-For an assessee in the business of leasing, letting out an owned asset constitutes its use for the purpose of business, entitling it to depreciation-SLP of revenue was dismissed on account of delay of 501 days and cost of Rs. 25000 was imposed.[Art. 136]

CIT, LTU v. Tata Motors Ltd. (2026) 310 Taxman 571 (SC) Editorial : CIT-LTU v. Tata Motors Ltd [2024] 165 taxmann.com 803 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 28(i) : Business loss-Misappropriated by husband of a partner-Commission-excess or unreasonable-Order of Tribunal disallowing the claim is affirmed. [S.37(1), 40A(2), 260A]

Karpaga Vinayagar Papers v. ACIT (2026) 310 Taxman 585 (Mad)(HC)