S. 148: Reassessment –Notice-Objections not raised against the reassessment notice-Writ petition was dismissed as premature.[S. 147, Art. 226]
BMN Steels Emporium (Chennai) v. Dy. CIT [2023] 155 taxmann.com 623 / (2025) 483 ITR 276 (Mad)(HC)S. 148: Reassessment –Notice-Objections not raised against the reassessment notice-Writ petition was dismissed as premature.[S. 147, Art. 226]
BMN Steels Emporium (Chennai) v. Dy. CIT [2023] 155 taxmann.com 623 / (2025) 483 ITR 276 (Mad)(HC)S. 148: Reassessment-Notice-Amalgamation-Information furnishes-Notice on transferor company and consequent assessment-Not valid.[S. 147]
PCIT v. Archit Securities Pvt. Ltd. (Successor of Anirudh Overseas Pvt. Ltd.) [2023] 155 taxmann.com 477 / (2025) 483 ITR 139 (Delhi)(HC)S. 147 : Reassessment-Faceless assessment-Natural justice-Adequate opportunity of hearing must be given-Order of reassessment quashed.[S. 144, 148, Art. 226]
Munirajappa Ravi v. ITO (2025) 483 ITR 713 (Mad)(HC)S. 147: Reassessment-No new tangible material-Reassessment not valid.[S. 148]
Kalinga Institute of Industrial Technology. v.ACIT (2025) 483 ITR 696 (Orissa)(HC)S. 147: Reassessment-Statement of searched party-Reassessment notice and order disposing the objection is held to be not valid. [S. 132(4), 133(6), 148, Art. 226]
Mahendrakumar Chandanmal Vinayakiya v. ITO [2023] 156 taxmann.com 28 /(2025) 483 ITR 243 (Guj)(HC)S. 147 : Reassessment-No fresh material-Reassessment notice and order disposing of the objection were quashed.[S. 148, Art. 226]
Manu Drives and Controls Pvt. Ltd v. ITO (2025) 483 ITR 238 (Guj)(HC)S. 147 : Reassessment-Notice-Incorrect facts-Reassessment proceedings quashed. [S. 148, Art. 226]
Kamlesh Kumari v. UOI (2025) 483 ITR 179(All)(HC)S. 147: Reassessment-Notice-Suspicion-Notice to verify details that income has escaped assessment is not valid.[S. 148, Art. 226]
Paranjape Schemes (Construction) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2025) 483 ITR 353 (Bom)(HC)S.147: Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-No failure to disclose material facts-Reassessment notice and order disposing of the objection is quashed.[S. 148, Art. 226]
Nathalal Ambalal and Sons v. ITO [2023] 156 taxmann.com 31 / (2025) 483 ITR 701 (Guj)(HC)S.147: Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Audit objection-No failure to disclose material facts-Reassessment notice and order disposing of the objection were quashed and set aside. [S. 148, Art. 226]
Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd v. Dy. CIT (2025) 483 ITR 655 (Guj)(HC)