This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-A reassessment notice that was already time-barred before 1-4-2021 under the erstwhile law cannot be revived by applying Sec. 149(1)(b) (w.e.f. 1-4-2021)-Reassessment proceedings (including those routed through Ashish Agarwal judgement) would still be beyond limitation-the Revenue’s SLP was dismissed for delay.[S. 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), 149, TOLA, 2020, S. 3 Art. 136]

ACIT v. Elan Capital Advisors (P.) Ltd(2025) 306 Taxman 336 (SC) Editorial : Virendra Ship Recyclers LLP v.ACIT(2025) 170 taxmann.com 558 (Bom)(HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Satisfaction of Assessing Officer at notice stage is sufficient for reopening-SLP assessee dismissed. [S. 147, 148A (b), 148A (d), Art. 136]

Vivek Kumar v. ITO (2025) 306 Taxman 101 (SC) Editorial: Vivek Kumar v. ITO (2025)175 taxmann.com 864 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 148 : Reassessment-Notice-Cash credits-Notice must be issued by the Faceless Assessing Officer (FAO) and not by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO)-Notice issued by JAO is a fatal defect and quashed.[S. 147, Art. 226]

Caishen Enterprise LLP v. ACIT(2025) 306 Taxman 138 (Bom)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-With in four years-Change of opinion-Depreciation-Survey-Examined during the original assessment proceedings-Reassessment not valid-Omission to pass a speaking order on receipt of objections cannot be considered as fatal.[S. 133A,143(3), 148, Art. 226]

SI Property (Kerala) (P.) Ltd. v. CIT (2025) 306 Taxman 44 (Ker.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-With in four years-Deemed Dividend-Trade Advances-Credit Balances-Common Shareholding-Reassessment Invalid. [S.2(22)(e), 148, Art. 226]

Relitrade Stock Broking (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (2025) 306 Taxman 133 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-With in four years-Interest on borrowed capital-Change of opinion-Full disclosure during original assessment-Reopening held invalid.[S.36(1)(iii), 147, Art. 226]

Sundararajan (P.) v. DCIT (2025) 306 Taxman 115 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 147: Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Alleged bogus purchases-Unexplained expenditure-Full disclosure-Reason to suspect-Order of Tribunal quashing the reassessment order was affirmed. [S.69C, 148, 260A]

PCIT v. Purple Suppliers (P.) Ltd. (2025) 306 Taxman 145 (Cal.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Non-compete Fee-Revenue expenditure-Change of opinion-Full disclosure of facts-Reassessment notice and order disposing the objection was quashed.[S. 37(1), 148, Art. 226]

Revathi Equipment Ltd. v. ACIT (2025) 306 Taxman 72 (Mad.)(HC)

S.147: Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Educational Society-Accumulation of income-Reassessment notice and order disposing the objection was quashed and set aside. [S. 11 (2), 14 Art. 226]

Symbiosis Open Education Society v. ACIT(2025) 306 Taxman 62 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 147: Reassessment-Unexplained money-Unaccounted sales-Information from Partner’s Complaint-Opportunity of Hearing-No Reliance Solely on Third-Party-Writ not maintainable-SLP of assessee dismissed. [S.69A, 148, Art. 136]

Shree Shakambhari Udyog Partnership Firm v. CIT (2025) 306 Taxman 339 (SC) Editorial: Shree Shakambhari Udyog Partnership Firm v. CIT (2025) 173 taxmann.com 955 (Pat) (HC)