This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
S. 151 : Reassessment-Sanction for issue of notice-Failure to furnish approval of Designated Authority along with reasons recorded-Non application of mind-Notice and order disposing of objections is set aside.[S. 147, 148, Art. 226]
Tia Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. v. ITO (2024) 468 ITR 5 (Delhi)(HC) Editorial : SLP of Revenue is dismissed, ITO v. Tia Enterprises Pvt. Ltd(2024) 468 ITR 10(SC)
S. 151 : Reassessment-Sanction for issue of notice-Notice issued after four or three years-Specified Authority for approval-Approval granted by Joint Commissioner-The authority statutorily empowered to confer approval would be the Principal Chief Commissioner or Chief Commissioner or Principal Commissioner or Commissioner-Notice and reassessment proceedings invalid.[S. 147, 148,148A(b), 148A(d), 151(ii)-Taxation And Other Laws (Relaxation And Amendment Of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020, S. 3. Art. 226]
Balkrishna Barsha Sutar v. ITO (2024)468 ITR 348 (Bom)(HC)
S. 151 : Reassessment-Sanction for issue of notice-Notice issued after four or three years-Specified Authority for approval-Approval granted by Joint Commissioner-The authority statutorily empowered to confer approval would be the Principal Chief Commissioner or Chief Commissioner or Principal Commissioner or Commissioner-Notice and reassessment proceedings invalid.[S. 147, 148,-Taxation And Other Laws (Relaxation And Amendment Of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020, S. 3. Art. 226]
Abhinav Jindal HUF v. ITO (2024)468 ITR 787/ 166 taxmann.com 536 (Delhi)(HC)
S. 151 : Reassessment-Sanction for issue of notice-Failure to furnish approval of designated authority Order of High Court quashing the proceedings is quashed-SLP of Revenue is dismissed. [S. 147, 148, Art. 136]
ITO v. Tia Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. (2024)468 ITR 10/301 Taxman 399 (SC) Editorial : Tia Enterprises Pvt. Ltd v. ITO (2024) 468 ITR 5 (Delhi)(HC)
S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Notice after three years-Sanction of Specified Authority-Approval to be obtained from Principal Chief Commissioner-Approval from Principal Commissioner-Sanction is invalid-Order and consequent notice is invalid. [S.147, 148,148A(b), 148A(d), 151(ii), Art.226]
Vodafone Idea Ltd. v Dy. CIT (2024)468 ITR 346 (Bom)(HC)
S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Faceless assessment-International tax charges-Notices issued by Jurisdictional Assessing Officers and consequent proceedings and orders set aside-Revenue is given liberty to proceed in accordance with new procedure. [S.144B, 147, 148, 148A, 151A, Art. 226]
Venkataramana Reddy Patloola v. Dy. CIT (2024)468 ITR 181 / 167 taxmann.com 411 (Telangana)(HC)
S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Pendency of appeal-Scrutiny assessment order pending in appeal rendered infructuous-Order passed under section 148A(d) is held to be valid-Assessee is given liberty to seek appropriate remedy if adverse reassessment order is passed.[S. 143(3), 147, 148, 148A(b) 148A(d), 250, Art. 226
Mittal Pigments Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT (2024)468 ITR 342 (Raj)(HC)
S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Loan-Non-consideration of explanation-Duty of Assessing Officer to consider assessee’s Explanation and pass reasoned order-Non application of mind-Notice and order is quashed and set aside. [S. 147, 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226]
Excel Commodity and Derivative Pvt. Ltd. v. UOI (2024)468 ITR 21 (Cal)(HC)
S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Notice after three years-Limitation-Income exceeding Rs 50 lakhs-Process for issuance of notice started before date of notification-Order and consequent notice is valid. [S. 147, 148, 148A(b) 148A(d), 149,Art. 226]
Jugal Kishore Lohiya v. PCIT (2024)468 ITR 288 (Raj)(HC)
S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Disclose of information-Notice and order disposing the objection is valid-Interpretation of taxing statutes-Literal Interpretation-It is settled that the words used in the provisions of a taxing statute are required to be given their plain meaning and nothing can be implied from or read into it.[S. 148, 148A(b) 148A(d) Art. 226]
Chaturbhuj Gattani v. ITO (2024)468 ITR 295/336 CTR 369/233 DTR 457 (Raj)(HC) Saroj Gattani v. ITO (2024)468 ITR 295/336 CTR 369/233 DTR 457 (Raj)(HC)