This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 276B : Offences and prosecutions-Failure to pay to the credit tax deducted at source-Belated deposit of TDS-Voluntarily deposited TDS along with interest before issuance of show cause notice-Delayed compliance of provision of deducting and depositing TDS would not suffice for grant of prosecution sanction. [S. 279, Art. 226]

Fortune Infovision (P) Ltd. v. CIT (2025) 174 taxmann.com 648/ 345 CTR 752 / 251 DTR 263 (Raj)(HC)

S. 276B : Offences and prosecutions-Failure to pay to the credit tax deducted at source-Belated deposit of TDS-Voluntarily deposited TDS along with interest before issuance of show cause notice-Delayed compliance of provision of deducting and depositing TDS would not suffice for grant of prosecution sanction. [S. 279, Art. 226]

Fortune Infovision (P) Ltd. v. CIT (2025) 174 taxmann.com 648/ 345 CTR 752 / 251 DTR 263 (Raj)(HC)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Non-filing of return-Filing of financial statements and tax audit report and payment of taxes-Bona fide inadvertent human error-No concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars-Penalty deleted. [Art. 226]

Goberdhandhanri Infratech (P.) Ltd. v. UOI (2025) 305 Taxman 664 / 345 CTR 641 / 252 DTR 30 (Patna)(HC)

S. 260A : Appeal-High Court-Review-Mistake apparent from record-Reassessment-Writ petition was filed after one year of assessment order-Dismissal of writ petition on ground of alternative remedy-Violation of principles of natural justice-Order recalled and writ petition restored.[S. 144, 144B, 147, 148, 260A(7), Art. 226]

D.D. Infrastructure (P.) Ltd. v. UOI (2025) 174 taxmann.com 215 / 345 CTR 652 / 251 DTR 93 (Cal)(HC). Editorial: Order of single judge recalled, D.D. Infrastructure (P) Ltd. v. UOI (2025) 345 CTR 658 / 251 DTR 100 (Cal)(HC)

S. 260A : Appeal-High Court-Delay of 40 days-Service of ITAT order on Chartered Accountant not specifically authorised to accept service-Chartered Accountant not a recognised agent of assessee-Tribunal bound to communicate order to assessee-Delay condoned. [S. 254(3), 282, ITAT R. 35, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908,Order, 3, 5, R. 12]

Neelam Ajit Phatarpekar (Mrs.) v. ACIT (2025) 176 taxmann.com 129 / 345 CTR 553 / 252 DTR 41 (Bom)(HC)

S. 245C : Settlement Commission-Settlement of cases-Full and true disclosure-Assessees disclosed entire receipts and offered part thereof as income after claiming balance as expenses-Deeper factual enquiry required-Rejection of application at stage of s. 245D(2C) not justified-Matter to be proceeded with under s. 245D(4)-Consequent transfer to Interim Board under s. 245AA. [S. 245AA, 245D(2C), 245D(4), Art. 226]

M. Vedamurthy v. ITSC (2025) 345 CTR 375 / 251 DTR 278 (Mad)(HC). Dr. Maya Vedamurthy v.PCIT (2025) 345 CTR 375 / 251 DTR 278 (Mad)(HC). RSV Skin & Laser Cenre v. Dy.CIT 2025) 345 CTR 375 / 251 DTR 278 (Mad)(HC).

S. 244A : Refund-Interest on refund-Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020-Belated grant of refund-Court empowered to award interest for delay attributable to Revenue [Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020, S. 4, 5(2), 6, 7, Art. 226]

ACIT v. Satwashil Vasant Mane (2025) 173 taxmann.com 105 / 345 CTR 659 / 251 DTR 169 (Ker)(HC).

S. 239 : Refunds-Limitation-Revised return-Condonation of delay-Application for condonation beyond six years from end of AY not maintainable-Assessee cannot take benefit of his own wrong-Interest under S. 244A not payable where delay attributable to assessee-Revenue to consider only claim of refund. (S. 119(2)(b), 139(5), 244A, Art. 226)

PCIT v. Subash Menon (2025) 171 taxmann.com 504 / 345 CTR 321 / 250 DTR 169 (Karn)(HC)

S. 237 : Refunds-Defective return-Rectified return filed-Return cannot be ignored merely due to TDS mismatch-Where no addition made in scrutiny, refund claim must be processed. [S. 139(9), 143(3), 153C, Art. 226]

Mukesh Garg v. ACIT (2025) 175 taxmann.com 142 / 345 CTR 788 / 251 DTR 228 (Delhi)(HC).

S. 206C : Collection at source-Trading-Alcoholic liquor-Forest produce-Scrap-Compounding fee and fine collected from offenders of illegal mining or transportation-No legislative mandate to collect TCS on compounding fee/fine collected under S. 23A of the MMDR Act-Obligation to collect TCS applies only to royalty payable by lawful lease or licence holders-Order of Tribunal set aside. [S. 2(47), 206(IC), Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation)Act, 1957, S.9, 23A, Rules 2015, R. 71(5)]

District Mining Officer v. DCIT (2025) 345 CTR 600 / 251 DTR 460 / 175 taxmann.com 1008 (Chhattisgarh)(HC) Editorial : SLP dismissed, DCIT (TDS) v. District Mining Officer (2026) 183 taxmann.com 119 (SC).