This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S.147: Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-No failure to disclose material facts-Reassessment is not valid. [S. 148, Art. 226]

Bhoomi Construction Projects v. ITO (2024) 469 ITR 547 (Bom)(HC)

S. 145 : Method of accounting-Rejection of accounts-Rule of consistency-Offering income to tax in year in which services rendered-Tax rate same and no loss to revenue-Rejection of books of account is not justified. [S. 260A]

PCIT v. Nokia Solutions and Networks India Pvt. Ltd. (2024)469 ITR 535 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 143(3): Assessment-Natural justice-24 hours time to respond notice-No adequate opportunity to respond to notice-Assessment order is quashed and set aside-Matter remanded. [S. 144B, Art. 226]

Spartek Ceramics India Ltd. v. Add. CIT (2024)469 ITR 584 (AP)(HC)

S. 139 : Return of income-Delay in filing return-Limitation-Delay of five months-CBDT-Period to be computed with reference to date on which return had been filed [S.119(2)(b), Art. 226]

Vivek Krishnamoorthy v. PCIT (2024)469 ITR 605 (Karn)(HC)

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Avoidance of tax-
International transaction-Comparable-Advertisement and marketing-No substantial question of law. [S.92CA, 260A]

PCIT v. Sony India Pvt. Ltd. (2024)469 ITR 495 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Avoidance of tax-International transaction-Comparable-No substantial question of law.[S.260A]

PCIT v. Mentor Graphics (India) Pvt. Ltd. (2024)469 ITR 524 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Avoidance of tax-International transaction-Selection of comparables-Determination of Arm’s Length Price based on examination of entire material on record-No question of law.[S. 260A]

PCIT v. Chrys Capital Investment Advisors (India) Pvt. Ltd. (2024)469 ITR 589 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 68 : Cash credits-Not explained the source-Addition is justified.[S. 260A]

Mayor Foundation v CIT (2024)469 ITR 562 (P&H)(HC)

S. 68 : Cash credits-Share capital-Identity of investors and source of income established-Deletion of addition is affirmed.[S. 260A]

PCIT v. Khyathi Steel Industries Pvt. Ltd. (2024) 469 ITR 579 (Karn)(HC)

S. 68 : Cash credits-Explained the source of deposit-Agriculturist-Deletion of addition is affirmed.[S. 69, 260A]

PCIT v.Joginder Singh Chatha [2023] 156 taxmann.com 509 / (2024)469 ITR 142 (P&H)(HC) Editorial : PCIT v.Joginder Singh Chatha [2023] 156 taxmann.com 509 (2024) 469 ITR 149 (SC), SLP of Revenue is dismissed, delay of 210 days,the reasons assigned for seeking condonation of delay are neither satisfactory nor sufficient in law to be condoned.