This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 44C: Non-residents-Head office expenditure-Expenditure on opening offshore branches of bank-money brought to India in foreign currency as per RBI circular-AO treated the expense as office expenses-Held, income from said transaction already taxed in India-Revenue Appeal dismissed. [S. 36(1)(iv), 40A(9), 40A(10), (260A R. 87, 88]

CIT(IT) v. Standard Chartered Grindlays Ltd. [2025] 171 taxmann.com 183 /[2026] 486 ITR 564 (Delhi)(HC)

S.37(1): Business expenditure-Amortisation of expenditure-expenditure on voluntary retirement scheme Employees at time of retirement paid gratuity and leave encashment-Allowable as business expenditure-Sums payable-Payments brought within scope of disallowance with effect from 1-4-2002-Provision not applicable to payments prior to that date. Allowable without any condition of actual payment prior to such date. [S. 35DD, 43B(f), 260A]

Ambalal Sarabhai Enterprises Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2026) 486 ITR 598 / 185 taxmann.com 647 (Guj)(HC

S. 28(iv): Business income-Value of any benefit or perquisites-Converted into money or not-Assignment of trade mark-Not value of any benefit or perquisite arising from business-No case made out for taxing consideration for sale of trade marks as profits chargeable to tax.[S.41(1), 260A]

Ambalal Sarabhai Enterprises Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2026) 486 ITR 598 / 185 taxmann.com 647 (Guj)(HC)

S. 12AA: Procedure for registration-Trust or institution-Charitable purpose-Registration cannot be denied merely because activities promote entrepreneurship, incubation or economic development; at the registration stage, CIT(E) is required to examine only charitable objects and genuineness of activities-High Court held the tribunal justified in directing grant of registration under section 12AA.[S. 2(15), 12AA(1)(b)(i), 260A]

CIT (E) v. AIC@36INCE [2025] 170 taxmann.com 496 /(2026) 486 ITR 416 (Chhattisgarh)(HC) Editorial: SLP of revenue dismissed, CIT (E) v. AIC@36INCE (2026) 486 ITR 422 / 182 taxmann.com 404 (SC)

S. 12AA: Procedure for registration-Trust or institution-Charitable purpose-Registration cannot be denied merely because activities promote entrepreneurship, incubation or economic development; at the registration stage, CIT(E) is required to examine only charitable objects and genuineness of activities-High Court held the tribunal justified in directing grant of registration under section 12AA-SLP of revenue was dismissed. [S. 2(15), 12AA(1)(b)(i), Art. 136]

CIT (E) v.Aic@36Ince (2026) 486 ITR 422/ 182 taxmann.com 404 ((SC) Editorial : CIT (E) v.Aic@36Ince [2025] 170 taxmann.com 496 /(2026) 486 ITR 416 (Chhattisgarh)(HC)

S. 12A: Registration-Trust or institution-No satisfactory explanation or reasons for delay in filing application for registration-Contradictory stand-Order of Tribunal affirmed. [S. 10(23C)(iiiad),260A]

Maheswara Educational Society v. DIT (E) [2025] 175 taxmann.com 74 / (2026) 486 ITR 392 (Telangana)(HC)

S.9(1)(vi): Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Royalty-Sale or supply of software-No transfer of copyright, only copyrighted article supplied-Receipts not liable to tax as royalty under Article 12(3) of India-Singapore DTAA-DTAA-India-Singapore. [S.90, Art. 12(3)]

CIT (IT) v. DXC Technology Services Singapore Pte. Ltd. [2024] 158 taxmann.com 431 / (2026) 486 ITR 423 (Delhi)(HC) Editorial: CIT (IT) v. DXC Technology Services Singapore Pte. Ltd. (2026) 486 425 / 309 Taxman 242 (SC), SLP of the revenue dismissed on account of delay of 598 days.

S. 2(22)(e) : Deemed dividend-Business advance-Utilised for payment of assessee’s personal tax under Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, and not for execution of job work; the same was rightly treated as deemed dividend-Order of Tribunal affirmed. [S.260A].

Jaykumar B. Patil(Deceased through Legal heir Nitin J. Patil v. JCIT [2025] 177 taxmann.com 431/2026] 486 ITR 627 (Bom) (HC)

S. 2(14)(iii): Capital Asset-Agricultural land-Sale of land as agricultural land-AO treated it as capital gain-Only village officer certificate as proof-Failure to produce evidence-Order of Tribunal rejecting the exemption was affirmed-No substantial question of law. [S. 45, 260A]

M.J. George v. Dy. CIT[2026] 486 ITR 239 / 182 taxmann.com 243 (Ker)(HC) Editorial: SLP dismissed, Gijo George v. Dy. CIT (2026] 309 Taxman 169 / 486 ITR 244 (SC)

S.147A: Reassessment – Constitutional validity – Retrospective amendment – Jurisdiction of Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) – Faceless assessment – Section 147A inserted by the Finance Act, 2026, with retrospective effect from 1-4-2021, clarifying that the Assessing Officer for the purposes of sections 148 and 148A shall mean an Assessing Officer other than the National Faceless Assessment Centre or any assessment unit – Amendment held unconstitutional and struck down. [ S. 120, 124, 127, 130, 144B, 147, 148 , 148A(b) , 148A(d), 151A , Income -Tax Act , 2025, S. 532,,536(2)(c), ,General Clauses Act, 1897 , S. 5 , Art. 14, 19(1)(g), 226, 265 ]

Bala Sreenivas Rao Somisetty & Ors v. ITO (AP)(HC) [www.itatonline.org]