This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 115BAA: Tax on income of certain domestic companies. Concessional tax regime -Delay in filing Form 10IC-Order of rejection set aside-Department directed to keep portal open to enable assessee to upload Form 10-IC and directed the assessee to file Form 10-IC within four weeks and the Department to deal with the claim of the assessee under section 115BAA on merits and in accordance with law. [S.119(2)(b), Art. 226]

MRF Ltd. v. CBDT (2025)172 taxmann.com 776 / (2026) 486 ITR 81 (Mad)(HC)

S. 90: Double taxation relief-Tax-Double taxation relief-Dividend distribution tax (DDT) levied under section 115-O held to be a ‘tax’ on dividend income of shareholders, though collected from distributing company for administrative convenience-Beneficial DTAA rate overrides domestic levy under section 115-O-Levy of DDT in excess of 10% held contrary to India-UK DTAA-Interpretation-Board for Advance Rulings-Gross tax rate in appropriate manner-DTAA-India-UK [S. 2(22), S. 2(24),2(43), S.4, S.90(2), S.115-O, 245Q, 245R, 245W, Art. 1, 2, 11].

Colorcon Asia Pvt. Ltd. v. JCIT [2025] 181 taxmann.com 301 / (2026) 486 ITR 476 / 348 CTR 268 (Bom)(HC) Editorial: SLP granted; referred to larger Bench, JCIT v. Colorcon Asia Pvt. Ltd. (2026) 186 taxmann.com 774 (SC)

S. 80IA: Industrial undertakings-Infrastructure development-Developer-Contractor-Works contract-Engaged in activity of construction of two projects and it had borne and undertaken all development risks, geological risks and investment risks; assessee was a developer of projects and not merely a works contractor and, thus, would be eligible for deduction under section 80-IA(4)-Order of Tribunal affirmed.-Interpretation of taxing statutes-Provision should be read rationally -[S.80IA(4), 260A]

CIT v. Patel Engg. Ltd. [2026] 486 ITR 538 /310 Taxman 408 (Bom)(HC)

S. 68: Cash credits-Unsecured loan-Source of source need not be proved-Order of Tribunal deleting the addition was affirmed. [S.260A]

Pr. CIT v. KRBL Infrastructure Ltd. [2025] 180 taxmann.com 502 /[2026] 486 ITR 88 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 55: Capital gains-Cost of improvement-Cost of acquisition-Income-Capital or revenue receipt-Compensation from transfer of self-generated trademarks, goodwill, marketing rights and know-how before insertion of the category ‘trademark or brand name’ in section 55(2)(a) effective from 01-04-2002, is to be treated as capital receipt, not revenue receipt. [S.2(14), 2(22B), 2(24(iv), 2(24)(iv), 45, 48, 55(2)]

Ambalal Sarabhai Enterprises Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2026) 486 ITR 598 / 185 taxmann.com 647 (Guj)(HC)

S. 45: Capital gains-Business income-Land held as an investment-Profit on sale of land held by assessee should be considered as capital gains and not business profits-Circular No. 4 of 2007 dated June 15, 2007 ([2007] 291 ITR (St.) 384) is also applicable to land. [S. 2(14), 4, 28(i), 260A]

CIT v. GWL Properties Ltd. (Formerly Gorden Woodroffe Ltd.)(2026) 486 ITR 430/ 183 taxmann.com 26 (Mad)(HC)

S. 44C: Non-residents-Head office expenditure-Expenditure on opening offshore branches of bank-money brought to India in foreign currency as per RBI circular-AO treated the expense as office expenses-Held, income from said transaction already taxed in India-Revenue Appeal dismissed. [S. 36(1)(iv), 40A(9), 40A(10), (260A R. 87, 88]

CIT(IT) v. Standard Chartered Grindlays Ltd. [2025] 171 taxmann.com 183 /[2026] 486 ITR 564 (Delhi)(HC)

S.37(1): Business expenditure-Amortisation of expenditure-expenditure on voluntary retirement scheme Employees at time of retirement paid gratuity and leave encashment-Allowable as business expenditure-Sums payable-Payments brought within scope of disallowance with effect from 1-4-2002-Provision not applicable to payments prior to that date. Allowable without any condition of actual payment prior to such date. [S. 35DD, 43B(f), 260A]

Ambalal Sarabhai Enterprises Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2026) 486 ITR 598 / 185 taxmann.com 647 (Guj)(HC

S. 28(iv): Business income-Value of any benefit or perquisites-Converted into money or not-Assignment of trade mark-Not value of any benefit or perquisite arising from business-No case made out for taxing consideration for sale of trade marks as profits chargeable to tax.[S.41(1), 260A]

Ambalal Sarabhai Enterprises Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2026) 486 ITR 598 / 185 taxmann.com 647 (Guj)(HC)

S. 12AA: Procedure for registration-Trust or institution-Charitable purpose-Registration cannot be denied merely because activities promote entrepreneurship, incubation or economic development; at the registration stage, CIT(E) is required to examine only charitable objects and genuineness of activities-High Court held the tribunal justified in directing grant of registration under section 12AA.[S. 2(15), 12AA(1)(b)(i), 260A]

CIT (E) v. AIC@36INCE [2025] 170 taxmann.com 496 /(2026) 486 ITR 416 (Chhattisgarh)(HC) Editorial: SLP of revenue dismissed, CIT (E) v. AIC@36INCE (2026) 486 ITR 422 / 182 taxmann.com 404 (SC)