S. 80G : Donation-Issue linked with registration u/s 12A-Matter remanded.[S.12A]
Nanchahal Family Memorial Trust v. CIT (E) (2025) 212 ITD 372 (Delhi)(Trib.)S. 80G : Donation-Issue linked with registration u/s 12A-Matter remanded.[S.12A]
Nanchahal Family Memorial Trust v. CIT (E) (2025) 212 ITD 372 (Delhi)(Trib.)S. 80G : Donation-Rejection of application-Non-service of notice-Matter remanded [S. 80G(5), 282]
Sharan Foundation v. CIT (2025) 212 ITD 463 (Amritsar)(Trib.)S. 80G : Donation-Deduction of 50% of CSR expenses-Receipts produced-Claim allowed [S. 37(1)]
DCIT v. Gabriel India Ltd. (2025) 212 ITD 468 (Mum)(Trib.)S. 80G : Donation-Some objects were religious in nature-Not incurred any expenditure which was of religious nature-Mere use of words ‘religious’ or ‘religion’ in few objects of trust deed would not mean that trust was not for charitable purpose but was for religious purpose. [S.80G (5), Form No 10AB]
Shree Mahavideh Charitable Trust. v. CIT (E) (2025) 212 ITD 587 (Surat) (Trib)S. 69C: Unexplained expenditure-Bogus purchases-Export of readymade garments-Sales not doubted-Profit margin embedded in value of such disputed purchases was to be estimated at 2.5 per cent. [S.133(6) 145]
Braham Dev Gupta. v. JCIT (2025) 212 ITD 238 (Delhi) (Trib.)S. 69A : Unexplained money-Cash deposited in bank-Source explained-Addition is deleted. [S. 115BBE]
Girishkumar Jamnadas Bhalodiya Kishan. v. ITO (2025) 212 ITD 249 (Rajkot) (Trib.)S. 69 :Unexplained investments-Immovable property-Source of investment is explained-Addition is deleted.
Bharat Mithalal Jain. v. ITO (2025) 212 ITD 232 (Mum) (Trib.)S. 68 : Cash credits-Demonetisation-Cash deposit-Senior citizen widow-Savings over 30 years-Addition deleted
Hemlata Kamalakar Deo v. ITO (2025) 212 ITD 264 (Mum)(Trib.)S. 68 : Cash credits-Long term capital gains on listed shares-Documentary evidence furnished-Addition as bogus LTCG unjustified. [S. 10(38), 45, 115BBE]
Arvind Kumar Kotawal v. ACIT (2025) 212 ITD 269 (Delhi)(Trib.)S. 68 : Cash credits-Cash deposit-Partly agricultural income-Addition is restricted to 8 lakhs.
Kanchanben Maheshbhai Patel. v. ITO (2025) 212 ITD 133 (Surat) (Trib.)