This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
S. 143(3) : Assessment-Unexplained expenditure-Purchase of bullion/jewellery-Question of fact-Writ petition is dismissed.[S.69C, 144B,Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017, Notification No. 12 of 2018 (Central Tax (2018) GSTR (St)1, Art. 226]
Mundhra Exim (P.) Ltd. v. NFAC(2024)470 ITR 691 /159 taxmann.com 682 (Mad) (HC)
S. 143(3) : Assessment-Limited scrutiny assessment-Assessing Officer had initially issued notice under section 143(2) for a limited scrutiny on three aspects-Assessing Officer could not have expanded scope of scrutiny without prior to obtaining approval for a complete scrutiny from appropriate authority. [S.119, 143(2), 260A]
PCIT v. Sukhdham Infrastructures LLP (2024)470 ITR 179 / 165 taxmann.com 84 (Cal) (HC)
S. 119 : Central Board of Direct Taxes-Circular-Defective return-Genuine hardship-Lock down period-Delay in filing application for rectification of error committed in return of income is condoned. [S. 44ADA, 119(2)(b),139(5), 139(9), 154, Art. 226]
Vrushti Aulkumar Shah v. PCIT (2023) 152 taxmann.com 77 /(2024) 470 ITR 229 (Guj) (HC)
S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Avoidance of tax-
International transaction-Foreign exchange gains/loss-Operating income/loss is proper-Comparable-Exclusion of comparable is proper. [S. 260A]
PCIT v. Global Logic India Ltd. (2024)470 ITR 149 (Delhi)(HC)
S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Avoidance of tax-International transaction-Comparable-Gains arising due to fluctuation in rate of foreign exchange-Income-safe harbour
PCIT v. Fiserv India Pvt. Ltd. (2024)470 ITR 145 (Delhi)(HC)
S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Avoidance of tax-
International transaction-Methods for determination of most appropriate method-Internal TNMM and not CUP method-Appellate authorities are not precluded from adopting a method different from that adopted by the assessee in the transfer pricing report-Order of Tribunal is affirmed-No substantial question of law. [S.260A]
PCIT v. Hellmann Worldwide Logistics India (P.) Ltd. (2024) 470 ITR 97 / 155 taxmann.com 44 (Delhi) (HC)
S. 45 : Capital gains-Transfer-Part performance of contract-Joint development agreement-No accrual-Not registered-Ownership is retained-Possessing is parted for limited purpose of development-Not liable to be assessed as capital gains.[S. 2(47)(v),153A, 153C, Registration Act, 1908, S.17(IA), 49, Transfer of Property Act, 1882, S 53A]
Prithvi Consultants Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2024)470 ITR 37 (Bom) (HC)
S. 40(a)(i) : Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Non-resident-Business expenditure-Commission paid to foreign agents on export of goods-Services rendered out side India-Not liable to tax in India-Not liable to deduct tax at source-No disallowance can be made [S. 9(1)(i), 37(1), 195, 260A]
PCIT v. Shantilal Khushaldas and Brothers Pvt. Ltd. (2024) 470 ITR 73 (Bom) (HC)
S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Expenses incurred on repairs and maintenance of stores-Allowable as revenue expenditure-Donation to Trust-Sardar-Allowable as deduction-Amount written off of new project, the question of law is admitted. [S.80G, 260A]
PCIT v. Gujarat State Fertilizers And Chemicals Ltd. (2024)470 ITR 363 (Guj) (HC)
S.37(1): Business expenditure-Solid waste disposal-Not contingent-Allowable as deduction.[S. 145, 260A]
PCIT v. Green Environment Services Co-Operative Services Ltd. (2024)470 ITR 249 (Guj) (HC)