This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 205 : Deduction at source-Bar against direct demand-Salaried employee-Tax deducted at source-Tax has been deducted at source but not deposited to Government’s account by deductor, deductee-assessee shall not be called upon to pay demand to extent tax has been deducted from his income-Department should not deny benefit of tax deducted at source by employer during relevant financial years. [S. 192, 199, 234B, 234C, Form 26AS, Art. 226]

Malay Kar v. UOI (2024) 299 Taxman 555 (Orissa) (HC)

S. 195 : Deduction at source-Non-resident-Other sums-Computer software manufacturers/suppliers, as consideration for resale/use of computer software through EULAs/distribution agreements-Not royalty-Not taxable in India-OEECD Model Convention-art 12 [S. 9(1)(vi), 9(1(vii), 195(2),201(IA), 260A]

CIT (LTU) v. Reliance Industries Ltd. (2024) 299 Taxman 488(Bom)(HC)

S. 153D : Assessment-Search and seizure-Approval-Approval cannot be merely a ritualistic formality or rubber stamping by authority, rather it must reflect an appropriate application of mind-Approval was granted by Addl. Commissioner for 43 cases on a single day-Order is quashed by the Tribunal-High Court affirmed the order of Tribunal. [S. 127, 132,133A, 260A]

PCIT v. Shiv Kumar Nayyar (2024) 299 Taxman 385 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 153A : Assessment-Search or requisition-Warrant of Authorisation-Panchnama-No search against the assessee-Panchanama reflected the name of the assessee-Panchnama cannot be treated as warrant of authorisation — Assessment order is quashed as without jurisdiction-Existence of alternative remedy — Not bar to entertainment of writ petition where challenge is to jurisdiction exercised by Authority and interpretation of statutory provisions involved [S. 132,153D, Art. 226]

Misty Meadows (P.) Ltd. v. UOI (2024) 299 Taxman 392 / 465 ITR 630/338 CTR 876 (P&H)(HC)

S. 153 : Assessment-Reassessment-imitation-Order giving effect to the order of the Tribunal-Expression ‘received’-Once a responsible officer of department becomes aware of order, period of limitation would commence from that point in time-Department is directed to remove demands and penalty reflected in ITBA portal and to refund amount lying with Department along with interest [S. 254(1), Art. 226]

Sunshine Capital Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2024) 299 Taxman 192 /338 CTR 898 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 151A : Faceless assessment of income escaping assessment-Notice reflecting name of concerned Income tax Authority-Department was to be directed to withdraw impugned notice and issue fresh notice if permissible under law as per scheme read with section 151A [S. 144B, 147,148,148A Art. 226]

Ram Narayan Sah v. UOI (2024) 299 Taxman 276 (Gau.)(HC)

S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Search-Unaccounted cash-Jurisdictional error-Question of jurisdictional error regard to invoking sections 147, 148 and 148A and not section 153C was raised, same should be considered by Assessing Officer and a finding be recorded thereon while passing final orders. [S. 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), 153C, Art. 226]

Neelam Dubey (Smt.) v. UOI (2024) 299 Taxman 379 (All.)(HC)

S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Seeking reappreciation of entire matter on its merits, which was impermissible in review jurisdiction-Review petition is dismissed [S. 144, 147, 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226]

Rahul Suri v. UOI (2024) 299 Taxman 526 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Unexplained money-information flagged under Risk Management Strategy (RMS)-Providing accommodation entries-Existence of information-Reopening of assessment is justified.[S. 69A,148, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226]

Rahul Sachan v. ITO (2024) 299 Taxman 369 / 466 ITR 353 (All.)(HC)

S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Cash credits-Cash deposited in bank account-Reply was not considered-Reassessment notice and order disposing the objection is set aside.[S. 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226]

Coonoor Sri Thanthi Mariamman Kerala Seva Sangam v. AUI (2024) 299 Taxman 470 (Mad.)(HC)