This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 2(22)(e) : Deemed dividend-Loan-More than 10% shares only on the first day of the previous year, and after transferring a substantial number of shares, its shareholding fell below 10% and continued below the 10% threshold for the remainder of the year-Addition as deemed dividend was deleted. [S. 2(22)(e), Expln. 3(b)]

Vinita Pawankumar Saraf v. ITO (2025) 238 TTJ 34 / 177 taxmann.com 548 (Mum.)(Trib)

S. 68 : Cash credits-Unexplained money-Cash deposits claimed as sale of scrap to unorganised dealers, accounted as “direct income”-No buyers’ details, tax collected at source information or Form 27EQ filed-Explanation unsupported-Matter remanded for fresh verification-Reassessment-Notice-Addition deleted by Commissioner (Appeals) on technical ground of non-mention in show-cause notice-Assessing Officer had in fact discussed issue and afforded opportunity-Matter remanded for fresh verification [S. 69, 69A, 115BBE, 147 , 148 , 206C]

DCIT v. Ingeneric Technologies Solutions P. Ltd. (2025) 132 ITR 794(Hyd) (Trib.)

S. 263: Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Search and seizure-Seized documents showing unaccounted loan/investment transactions with repayments through billing account and large cash payments-Assessment made without proper enquiry-Assessing Officer taxing only commission instead of undisclosed income-Revision upheld. [S. 68, 69, 69A, 132, 153A]

Naveen Narang v. Pr. CIT (2025) 132 ITR 759 (Delhi) (Trib.)

S. 92C: Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Avoidance of tax-International transaction-Specified domestic transaction-Loan to associated enterprise in Bahrain-Benchmarking using US/European data inappropriate-Bahrain Central Bank’s prime lending rate reflects arm’s length rate-Upward adjustment unsustainable-Business expenditure-Disallowance-Payment for product certification services-Not fees for technical services-No tax deductible at source-Disallowance deleted.-Withholding liability arises only when income taxable in recipient’s hands-Royalty payable only on activation by end-user-Provision for royalty rightly allowed. [S.9(1)(vii) 40(a)(ia(195 R.10B]

DCIT v. Elitecore Technologies P. Ltd. (now merged with Sterlite Technologies Ltd.) (2025) 132 ITR 740(Ahd) (Trib.)

S. 271D : Penalty-Acceptance of loans/deposits otherwise than by crossed cheque-Assessee claiming bank account used by others for demand drafts towards liquor licence applications-Affidavits of depositors stereotyped, not clarifying position at time of repayment-Matter remanded for fresh verification. [S. 269SS, 269T, 271E]

Prem Singh Saini v. ACIT (2025) 132 ITR 720(Jaipur) (Trib.)

S. 263: Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue–Assessing Officer failing to consider applicability of minimum alternate tax provisions to assessee-company-Incorrect assumption of facts and incorrect application of law-Revision justified-Book profits-Exclusion from minimum alternate tax-No specific exemption for company under voluntary liquidation-Provisions of company law regarding preparation of accounts not relevant-ITR-6 pro forma recognising liquidation cannot override the Act-Section 115JB clearly applicable-Provisions of minimum alternate tax clearly applicable-Revision justified-Assessee-company undergoing voluntary liquidation citing impossibility of preparing statement of profit and loss-Held, profits and losses determinable under any system of accounts followed, enabling computation of minimum alternate tax.[S.115JB, Companies Act , 1956 , S. 551 , Companies Act , 2013, S. 348]

Industrial Investment Bank of India Ltd. v. PCIT (2025) 132 ITR 698(Kol) (Trib.)

S. 263: Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue–Notice and order issued in name of erstwhile company but mentioning factum of amalgamation in cause title-Not invalid-Nothing to establish that issues on which revision exercised were examined by Assessing Officer during assessment-Duty cast on Assessing Officer to examine issues not performed-Order of Principal Commissioner setting aside assessment order-Proper. [S. 14A, 40(a)(i), 143(3)]

Simens Healthcare Diagnostics Ltd. (through successor in interest Siemens Ltd.) v. PCIT (2025) 132 ITR 679(Ahd) (Trib.)

S. 9(1)(i): Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Business connection-Non-resident-Permanent establishment-Assessee acquiring group in May 2016, falling in financial year relevant to assessment year 2017-18-No transaction or business connection between assessee and Indian entity during relevant assessment year 2016-17, prior to date of acquisition-Indian entity not associated enterprise at relevant time-No agency permanent establishment-Assessment of attributed profits quashed-DTAA-India-USA. [art. 5(4)]

Western Digital Technologies Inc. v. DCIT (2025) 132 ITR 664(Bang) (Trib.)

S. 143(2) : Assessment –Notice-Limitation-To be reckoned from date of filing of original return and not from date of curing of defects-Return filed under section 139(1) within time-Defect notice under section 139(9) subsequently cured-Notice under section 143(2) issued beyond time-limit reckoned from date of original return-Assessment without jurisdiction-Quashed. [S. 139(1), 139(9)]

Aark Infosoft P. Ltd. v. ACIT (2025) 132 ITR 646(Ahd) (Trib.)

S. 195: Deduction of tax at source-Payment to non-resident-Liability to deduct tax only if income of non-resident chargeable to tax in India-Standard software licences-End-user licence agreements not transferring copyright-Payments not royalty-Provisions of domestic law not applicable when Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement more beneficial to assessee-No obligation to deduct tax at source-DTAA-India-UK. [S. 9(1)(vi), 90(2), 201(1), 201(1A), Art. 13]

DCIT v. Vodafone West Ltd. (2025) 132 ITR 633(Ahd) (Trib.)