This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
S. 197: Deduction at source-Certificate for lower rate-Court held that rejection of the application without examining statutory parameters under Rule 28AA and without assigning reasons was arbitrary and unsustainable. The order was set aside, and the matter remanded to the Assessing Officer for passing a fresh reasoned and speaking order.[Rule 28AA, Art. 226]
Make Mytrip (India) (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2026) 310 Taxman 208 / 489 ITR 54 (Delhi)(HC)
S. 197: Deduction at source-Certificate for lower rate-Providing domain registration and web hosting services sought a nil-rate certificate-Proposal to fil an SLP-Application under section 197 must be decided as per Act and DTAA and not on revenue considerations, order was unsustainable and nil-rate certificate was directed to be issued-DTAA-India-USA [S.9(1)(vi), 9(1)(vii), Art. 12, Art. 226]
Godaddy.Com LLC v. Dy.CIT(IT) (2026] 310 Taxman 29 (Delhi)(HC) Editorial : ACIT v. Godaddy.Com LLC ([2026] 190 taxmann.com 84 (SC), SLP of revenue dismissed.
S. 197: Deduction at source-Certificate for lower rate-Make avialble-Assessee, a US company, provided support services to Indian AEs; cross charges received by the assessee from its AEs were not taxable as FTS/FIS or royalty under India-US DTAA, as the services did not make available technical knowledge nor involve transfer of copyright-DTAA-India-USA-SLP of revenue dismissed.[S.9(1)(vi), 9(1)(vii),Art. 12(3), Art. 136]
ITO v. Aecom Technical Services Inc [2026] 310 Taxman 662 (SC) Editorial : Aecom Technical Services Inc. v. ITO(IT) [2025] 305 taxman 234 /[2026] 485 ITR 357 (Delhi) (HC)
S. 195 : Deduction at source-Non-resident-Other sums-Virtual service-Petitioner-LLP was issued a certificate under section 195 at 5.25% despite a prior High Court finding of no taxability and remand, certificate was to be treated as one of ‘Nil’ rate rather than 5.25% for relevant and subsequent years if application was made, and competent authority could depart from this only if it found a PE in India or taxability on merits in future applications-DTAA-India-UK [S. 9(1)(i), Art. 5, Art. 226]
Ernst and Young LLP v. ACIT(IT) [2026] 310 Taxman 25 (Delhi)(HC)
S. 194LA: Deduction at source-Compensation on acquisition of certain immovable property-Compensation awarded on account of compulsory acquisition of land was not subject to deduction of tax at source-All payments made pursuant to the Mediation Agreement, whether to joint accounts or individual accounts, shall be effected without any deduction of tax at source. [The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, 89, read with Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC.]
Executive Engineer, BNT Project v. State (2026) 310 Taxman 685 (Karn)(HC)
S. 194C: Deduction at source-Contractors-Common Area Maintenance (CAM)-Not rent-Liable to deduct tax at source under section 194C and not under section 194I-SLP of revenue dismissed. [S. 194I, Art. 136]
CIT v. Bose Corporation India (P.) Ltd. (2026) 310 Taxman 178 (SC) Editorial : CIT(TDS) v. Bose Corporation India (P.) Ltd. (2026) 184 taxmann.com 218 (Delhi)(HC)
S. 153C: Assessment-Income of any other person-Search and seizure-Third party statement not relied upon-Opportunity of cross-examination not required-Writ petition dismissed. [Art. 226]
Sugunapuram Palanisamy Velumani v. ACIT (2026) 310 Taxman 479 (Mad)(HC)
S. 153A : Assessment-Search-No incriminating material-Unabated assessment-Order of Tribunal deleting the addition is affirmed. [S. 143(1), 143(3), 260A]
PCIT, Central v. Maneesh Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (2026) 310 Taxman 470 (Bom)(HC)
S. 153A: Assessment-Search-Short-term capital loss-Block period-Previous assessment order(s) of block period become infructuous or unenforceable, irrespective of fact whether or not the issue or demand allowance/disallowance that was made previously has been dealt with and incorporated-no disallowance of short-term capital loss in case of assessee in subsequent order; such position would prevail. [S.132, 143(3)]
Triple S. Stock and Shares (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (2026) 310 Taxman 652 (Delhi)(HC)