This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 237 : Refunds-Defective return-Rectified return filed-Return cannot be ignored merely due to TDS mismatch-Where no addition made in scrutiny, refund claim must be processed. [S. 139(9), 143(3), 153C, Art. 226]

Mukesh Garg v. ACIT (2025) 175 taxmann.com 142 / 345 CTR 788 / 251 DTR 228 (Delhi)(HC).

S. 206C : Collection at source-Trading-Alcoholic liquor-Forest produce-Scrap-Compounding fee and fine collected from offenders of illegal mining or transportation-No legislative mandate to collect TCS on compounding fee/fine collected under S. 23A of the MMDR Act-Obligation to collect TCS applies only to royalty payable by lawful lease or licence holders-Order of Tribunal set aside. [S. 2(47), 206(IC), Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation)Act, 1957, S.9, 23A, Rules 2015, R. 71(5)]

District Mining Officer v. DCIT (2025) 345 CTR 600 / 251 DTR 460 / 175 taxmann.com 1008 (Chhattisgarh)(HC) Editorial : SLP dismissed, DCIT (TDS) v. District Mining Officer (2026) 183 taxmann.com 119 (SC).

S. 201 : Deduction at source-Failure to deduct or pay-Assessee in default-Limitation-Order passed beyond period prescribed under section 201(3) is barred by limitation-Liberty granted by Court to proceed “in accordance with law” does not override statutory limitation-Order and notice quashed. [S. 153(6)(i), 194C, 201(3), Art. 226]

Swiftrans International (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (2025) 174 taxmann.com 1185 / 345 CTR 667 / 251 DTR 177 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 158BE : Block assessment-Time limit-Search and seizure-Deemed seizure-Limitation to be reckoned from date of conclusion of last search and not from date of initial search-Block assessment order held within limitation. [S. 132(1), 132(3), 158BC, 260A]

CIT v. Vedanta Ltd. (2025) 175 taxmann.com 538 / 345 CTR 612 / 252 DTR 1 (Mad)(HC)

S. 153C : Assessment-Income of any other person-Search-Limitation-In case of “other person”, limitation period is to be reckoned from date on which seized material is received by Assessing Officer having jurisdiction over such other person and not from date of issuance of show-cause notice-Writ petition dismissed. [Ss. 132, 132A, Art. 226]

KLP Projects (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2025) 174 taxmann.com 291 / 345 CTR 783 / 249 DTR 177 (Mad)(HC)

S. 153C : Assessment-Income of any other person-Search-Limitation-Assessment proceedings before AO not judicial proceedings-Evidence Act not applicable-Amendment to S. 2(12A) defining “books and books of accounts” is clarificatory and retrospective-Electronic/digital data covered-Date of satisfaction note deemed date of handing over for computing limitation-Assessments not time-barred-Writ partly allowed for limited remand. [S.2(12A), 132, 153A, 153B, Indian Evidence Act, 1872, S. 65A, 65B, Art. 226]

LKS Gold House (P) Ltd. v. DCIT [2024] 161 taxmann.com 604/ (2025) 345 CTR 15 / 250 DTR 231 (Mad)(HC)

S. 153A: Assessment-Search-Reassessment-Notice-Limitation-Where search under s. 132 was conducted in FY 2022-23, the block of six assessment years would be six years preceding AY 2023-24 and thus AY 2016-17 falls beyond the permissible period-Extended period of ten years not applicable in absence of income represented in the form of an asset-Notice and consequential proceedings quashed. [S. 132, 148, 149(1)(b), Art. 226]

Smart Chip (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2025) 345 CTR 417 / 476 ITR 389 / 174 taxmann.com 297 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 153A : Assessment-Search-Writ not maintainable merely on alleged breach of natural justice-Non-grant of cross-examination not a ground to bypass statutory appeal-S. 65B of Evidence Act, 1872 and 63 of Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 inapplicable to assessment proceedings-CBDT Digital Evidence Investigation Manual, 2014 has no statutory force-Single Judge order set aside.[S. 119, 132,143(3) 246A, Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, S. 63, Evidence Act 1872, S. 65B, Art. 226]

ACIT v.Vetrivel Minerals (V.V. Minerals) (2025) 345 CTR 1 / 250 DTR 217 / 174 taxmann.com 110 (Mad)(HC) ACIT v. Vijay Cements (2025) 345 CTR 1 / 250 DTR 217 / 174 taxmann.com 110 (Mad)(HC) Editorial : Vetrivel Minerals (V.V. Minerals) v. ACIT (2021) 323 CTR 766/ 208 DTR 282 (Mad)(HC) set aside, LKS Gold House (P) Ltd & Ors v. Dy CIT (2025) 345 CTR 15/250 DTR 231 (Mad)(HC), approved.

S. 149 : Reassessment-Time limit for notice-Retrospective applicability of S. 149(1)(c)-Explanation inserted by Finance Act, 2012 clarifies that amended sub-ss. (1) and (3) apply to “any assessment year” beginning on or before 1-4-2012-Word “any” not restrictive-Amendment to s. 147 by insertion of Expln. 4 also relevant-Earlier decision in Brahm Datt not considering said Explanation and Notes on Clauses-Matter referred to Chief Justice for constitution of Larger Bench. [S. 147, 148, 149(1)(c), Art. 226]

U.K. Paints (Overseas) Ltd. v. ACIT (2025) 345 CTR 337 / 251 DTR 289 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry and providing opportunity before issue of notice-Faceless collection of information-No challenge to constitutional validity of S. 135A-Disputed factual issues cannot be examined in writ jurisdiction-Reassessment notice upheld and writ petition dismissed. [S. 135A, 148, Art. 226]

Nimesh Sharad Shah v. ACIT (2025) 175 taxmann.com 528 / 345 CTR 863 / 252 DTR 212 (Bom)(HC)