This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 10(26AAA) : Income of Sikkimese-Individual-Income not included-Definition of ‘Sikkimese’ as amended by Finance Act, 2023-Definition limited to Income-tax Act only-Does not affect rights under Article 371F(k) of Constitution of India-PIL dismissed. [Art. 226, 371F(k)]

Dr. Doma T. Bhutia v. UOI (2025) 481 ITR 495 /172 taxmann.com 293// 343 CTR 652 / 247 DTR 580 (Sikkim) (HC) Editorial : Dr. Doma T. Bhutia v. UOI (2025) 481 ITR 505 /307 Taxman 4 / 347 CTR 114 (SC), SLP dismissed.

S. 10(26AAA): Income of Sikkimese – Individual-Income not included-Definition of ‘Sikkimese’ as amended by Finance Act, 2023-Definition limited to Income-tax Act only-Does not affect rights under Article 371F(k) of Constitution of India-PIL dismissed-SLP dismissed.[Art. 136, 371F(k)]

Dr. Doma T. Bhutia v.UOI (2025) 481 ITR 501/307 Taxman 4/347 CTR 114 (SC) Editorial : Dr. Doma T. Bhutia v. UOI (2025) 481 ITR 495 /172 taxmann.com 293/ 343 CTR 652 (Sikkim)(HC)

S.10(26) : Schedule Tribes-Member of Scheduled Tribe community of Rajasthan, was posted at Agartala, Tripura, a specified area-Entitled to benefits of exemption from income tax flowing from provisions of section 10(26) of the Act. [Art. 226]

UOI v. Chyawan Prakash Meena B (2025) (2025) 481 ITR 758 / 174 taxmann.com 271 (Gauhati) (HC)

S. 276C : Offences and prosecutions-Wilful attempt to evade tax-HSBC (Suisse) accounts-Unauthenticated DTAA-sourced information from France about alleged Swiss bank accounts, coupled with no incriminating material found in search and no corroboration, cannot sustain prosecution.[S.132, 132(4), 276D, 277, 278E]

Anurag Dalmia v. ITO (2025) 306 Taxman 304 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Cash credits-Adequate enquiry by Assessing Officer-Lack of enquiry-General observation by CIT-High Court affirmed the order of Tribunal-SLP of revenue dismissed.[S. 68, 143(3),153A, Art. 136]

PCIT, Central v. Prabhu Poly Pipes Ltd. (2025) 306 Taxman 161 /481 ITR 506 (SC) Editorial: PCIT Central v. Prabhu Poly Pipes Ltd. [2025] 176 taxmann.com 693/481 ITR 503 (Cal.) (HC)

S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal-Powers-Settlement Commission-CIT(A) did not adjudicate issue on merits and dismissed the appeal-Tribunal remanded matter back to CIT(A) for consideration-High Court affirmed the order of the Tribunal-SLP of revenue dismissed.[S. 245D(4), 245HA, 246A, 250, Art. 136]

PCIT v. MD Industries (P.) Ltd. (2025)306 Taxman 89 (SC) PCIT v. MD Industries (P)(Ltd (2025) 306 Taxman 344 (SC) Editorial: followed in Pr. CIT v. MD Industries (P.) Ltd. (2025) 306 Taxman 344 (SC), the High Court decision is reported in PCIT v. MD Industries (P.) Ltd. (2025) 172 taxmann.com 91/473 ITR 744 (Guj.) (HC).

S. 244A: Refund-Interest on refund-Delay in filing return condoned-Assessee not at fault-Deductor failed to intimate TDS and issue Form 16A-Interest payable from date of TDS deposit till date of refund-Delay of 471 days-SLP of revenue dismissed on account of delay as well as on merits. [S. 119(2)(b), 194LA, Rule 13 of IT Rules, Art. 136]

PCIT v. Chandrikaben Rajeshbhai Undhad [2025] 306 Taxman 347 (SC) Editorial : Mohanbhai Madhavjibhai Bharad v. PCIT(2024) 158 taxmann.com 13/ 465 ITR 313 (Guj)(HC)

S. 244A: Refund-Interest on refund-Delay in filing return condoned-Assessee not at fault for non-claim of refund-Deductor failed to inform TDS and issue Form 16A-Interest payable from date of TDS deposit till the date of refund-Delay of 457 days-SLP dismissed on account of delay as well as on merits. [S.119(2)(b), 194LA, Rule 13 of IT Rules, Art. 136]

PCIT v. Bhimjibhai Madhavjibhai Bharad [2025] 306 Taxman 334 (SC) Editorial : Bhimjibhai Madhavjibhai Bharad v.PCIT (2024) 158 taxmann.com 13/ 465 ITR 313 (Guj)(HC)

S. 206C : Collection at source-Trading-Forest produce-Illegal mining-TCS applies only to payments by lease/license/contract-holders and cannot extend to compounding fees/fines from illegal miners-Order of Tribunal set aside. [S.133A, 206(IC), MMDR Act, 23A(1), R.71(5)]

Collector Mining, Kanker v. DCIT (TDS) (2025) 306 Taxman 362 (Chhattisgarh)(HC)

S. 194C : Deduction at source-Contractors-Slum rehabilitation scheme on a particular plot of land-Transferable development rights (TDR)-Assessee having made out a prima facie case, implementation and operation of impugned order passed under sections 201 and 201(1A) deserved to be stayed, and consequently, demand and penalty notices were also to be stayed-Revenue was directed to file reply on or before 25th August 2025. [S.194B, 194LA, 194R, 201, 201(IA), 271C, 274, MRTP Act, 1966, S.126, Art. 226]

Pune Municipal Corporation v. ACIT, TDS (2025)306 Taxman 175 (Bom.)(HC)