This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S.115BAA : Tax on income of certain domestic companies – Determination of tax in certain cases – Option exercised under section 115BAA – Rate of tax applicable – Long term capital gains – Company opting for taxation under section 115BAA is liable to pay tax at 22% on total income including long-term capital gains and not at 20% as per section 112. [S. 45 , 112, 143(1), Form 10IC ]

Maharishi Education Corporation (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (SMC ) (Delhi)(Trib.) www.itatonline .org

S. 275 : Penalty – Bar of limitation – Recording of satisfaction-Cross objection- CBDT Circular binding on department -Period of limitation is to be reckoned from the date of recording of satisfaction by the AO in the assessment order and not from the date of notice issued by the Joint/Additional CIT. [ S.119, 269SS , 271D, 271E ,271AAA, 275(1)( c) ]

Jayapriya Company v. DCIT (Chennai)(Trib.) www.itatonline.org

S. 263 : Commissioner – Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue -Limited Scrutiny – Deemed rental income -Order passed after due enquiry cannot be treated as erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of revenue – PCIT cannot revise assessment to include issues beyond the scope of limited scrutiny (S.143(3), IND AS-115 )

Sameer Ramesh Vashi v. PCIT (Mum)(Trib)www.itatonline.org

S. 276 : Offences and prosecutions – Removal – Concealment – Transfer –Delivery – Property – Thwart recovery – Offences by companies – Prosecution of directors without impleading company – Not maintainable – Arraignment of company is a condition precedent for prosecuting its directors – Company being the principal offender must first be made an accused – Proceedings against directors alone quashed [S. 278B , 281, CrPC, 1973, S. 482 BNSS, Act , 2023, S. 528 , Negotiable Instruments Act , 1881 , S. 141 ]

Nilesh Agarwal v. ITO ( Delhi)( HC) www.itatonline.org Rakesh Agarwal v. ITO (Del)(HC) www.itatonline.org

S. 92C : Transfer Pricing – Arm’s length price – Avoidance of tax -International transaction – Characterisation of Indian Entity – Limited Risk Distributor -Entrepreneurial Service Provider- Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) – Other Method under Rule 10AB – Re-characterisation of Transactions – Royalty Computation – Transfer Pricing Adjustment of ₹444.93 Cr held to be unsustainable .[ R. 10AB ]

Netflix Entertainment Services India LLP v. DCIT (Mum)(Trib) www.itatonline .org

S. 276C : Offences and prosecutions – Wilful attempt to evade tax – Failure to pay self-assessment tax along with return – Mere delay in payment of self-assessment tax does not amount to wilful attempt to evade tax – Continuation of prosecution would be abuse of process of law – Complaint quashed and dismissed . [S.139, 140A,143(1), 276C(1), 276(2) ,276B, 278E, 279(1),Art. 227]

Vilas Babanrao Kalokhe v. PCIT (2025 (Bom)(HC) www.itatonlineorg

S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal –Duties – Alleged AI-generated order – Bias apprehension – Transfer of case – Once the ITAT President reassigned the matter to another Bench, writ petition seeking deferment of hearing became infructuous .[Art. 226, 227]

Buckeye Trust v. Registrar, ITAT ((Karn) (HC) www.itatonline.org Editorial : Buckeye Trust v. CIT (ITA No. 1051 /Bang / 2024 dt 30-12 -2024 . ITAT suo -moto recalled the order u/s 254(2) of the Act by order dated 7 -1 -2025 , www.itatonline.org

S. 263 : Commissioner – Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue – Special category States – Manufacture of essential oils and perfumery -Assessment without incriminating material – Search assessment – Deduction u/s 80IC – Revisionary power cannot be exercised in respect of completed/unabated assessments in absence of incriminating material – Revision order quashed. [S. 80IC, 132, 143(3), 153A, 153C , 153D]

Raj Impex v. PCIT (Central), Mumbai-1 (Mum)(Trib) www.itatonline.org

S. 9(1)(vii) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India – Fees for technical services (FTS) – Functional Service Agreement – Standardized support services – No managerial, technical or consultancy element – Not taxable as FTS- DTAA – India–Belgium . [S.9(1)(vi)), Art. 12(3)(a), 12(3)(b)]

Solvay S.A. v. DCIT (Intl. Tax), (Mum)(Trib) www.itatonline.org

Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960

S. 92: Limitation –Co -Operative Housing Society – Recovery of maintenance charges – Continuous cause of action – Claim not time-barred – Section 92 is a special provision of limitation which overrides the Limitation Act – Orders of the Co-operative Court and Appellate Court were set aside and the dispute was allowed– The opponent was directed to pay arrears of Rs. 12,15,141 with 9% interest per annum from the respective dates of default till realization. [ S.92(1(b ), Limitation Act, 1963, Art 226 ]

Giri Chhaya Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. v. Sushila Laliwala (since deceased) through heirs and legal representatives (Bom)(HC) www.itatonline.org .