Answers On Category: Income-Tax
  Income Tax Return for closed Companies
The Company has received the closure notice from ROC after submission of all formalities for closure. After closure the company applied for surrender of PAN Card. Till now neither PAN has been deactivated nor any reply received from Department for surrender order. Should the closed company need to continue file IT Return even after the PAN Surrender since PAN has not been deactivated.


► Read Answer

  MSME and 43B payments
With effect from 1/4/2023, any sum payable by the assessee to Micro or Small enterprises beyond the time limit specified in section 15 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises development act, 2006 shall not be allowed as deduction. There are three questions with respect to said amendments Old Dues outstanding to MSME due to any reasons (before 1/4/2023) and not paid during the year and still outstanding as on balance sheet date.  Will the such balances be required to added to income. Whether the micro or small enterprise which has obtained UDHAYM registration will only be counted or unregistered…


► Read Answer

  Time limit of 143(3) assessment order for Assessment year 2018-19
There was an extension of time limit for order as per section 143(3). What was the last date for this order


► Read Answer

  FEMALE HUF KARTA
Can wife become karta in HUF in presence of her husband?


► Read Answer

  Addition on account of one time deposit for maintenance
Assessee is promoter and Developers. During the course of its business accepted the one time maintenance from the  unit purchaser and disclosed as deposit liability in the audited financial statement. on the completion of project the amount is handed  over to society or apartment .This policy and method has been followed by the assessee since last 10 years and also accepted in the assessment U/SEc. 143(3) of the Act.  Under the Service Tax Act as well as under GST Act this amount is accepted as deposit and no tax has been levied. Assessee submitted that it is not business receipts…


► Read Answer

  SEc. 68 and Cash deposit during demonetization by NBFC
Assessee is NBFC registered under Co Act as well as RBI. During the period of demonetization assessee co accepts cash in old currency amounting to Rs 1410000/- from the borrowers up to 14.11.2016 and from 15.11.2016 till 31.12.2016 amounting to Rs. 2010000/-. Ao has made addition U/sec. 68 on the ground that NBFC are not permitted to accept currency in Old Notes from any one and therefore the amount is unexplained cash credit to be added U/sec. 68, eventhough assessee co has given complete details of the persons from whom amount is received towards repayment of loan taken from NBFC. …


► Read Answer

  Prosecution proceedings for delay in payment of TDS
Assessee is charitable trust having object of Education . During the year due to financial difficulties could not make the payment of TDS in time , however before receiving any notice from the department paid the TDS along with the interest . Now PCIT has issued SCN U/SEc. 276B/276BB of the Act. Assessee trust has submitted detailed reply stating the reasons for delay . however the PCIT  has decided to initiate the prosecution proceedings . whether he is justified in law ? is there any remedy available ?  whether the assessee should filed the WP before the HC? pl guide


► Read Answer

  Cash Purchases U/sec. 40A(3)
Assessee is partnership firm engaged in ginning of cotton. It purchases cotton in cash from agriculturist through the Adatya claimed that it is payment to agriculturist and no disallwance be made u/sec. 40 A(3) of Act.  Agriculturist confirm this transcation and accepted that they have received payment in cash.  Ao has disallowed U/Sec  40 A(3) on the ground that it is not transcation between agriculturist and not covered by exception provided in Rules.  Is action of AO is legally justified


► Read Answer

  SECTION 36(1)(VA)
Is there any remedy for 36(1)(va), if appeal filed before checkmate judgement of supreme court.


► Read Answer

  Deemed Dividend
When lending company has deposited funds in a firm engaged in money lending activities for earning interest and such firm has advanced funds to substantial shareholders of lending company but such substantial shareholders have no control over the firm who has extended funds to substantial shareholders on interest, whether provisions of section 2(22)(e) could be invoked in the case of substantial shareholders even though there is no debit balance in the books of lending company to their account.


► Read Answer