CIT vs. Raval Tiles & Vijayjyot (Bombay High Court)

Related Judgements

1. CIT vs. Nicholas Piramal (Bombay High Court) 

   As s. 192 requires the employer to deduct tax on the “estimated income” of the employee, the test is whether he acted in a bona fide and honest manner. Where the employer allowed the employees deduction under sections 10(5) and 10(14) only on the basis of declarations filed by…

2. CIT vs. Eicher Ltd (Delhi High Court) 

   Non-compete compensation paid to an employee for an indefinite period is business expenditure and not capital expenditure as no capital asset or benefit of enduring benefit came into existence. While the lenght of the period of the covenant is important, it is not decisive. What is more important is…

3. CIT vs. Dodsal Ltd (Bombay High Court) 

   It is not possible to accept the submission of the Revenue that once the AO comes to the conclusion that there is a breach of the mandate of Section 158BFA(1), then the penalty has to be mandatorily imposed. The terminology of section 158BFA makes it clear that the AO…

4. Mahendra D. Jain vs. ITO (Bombay High Court) 

   Where the assessee is carrying on an illegal activity which is treated as a business, any loss arising in such business as a result of confiscation by the authorities is an allowable loss. However, where the assessee is carrying on a lawful business, any loss arising as a result…

5. CIT vs. Wallfort Shares & Stocks (Bombay High Court) 

   Where the assessee bought units of a mutual fund, received tax-free dividend thereon and immediately thereafter redeemed the units and claimed the difference between the cost price and redemption value as a loss and the same had been upheld by … CIT vs. Wallfort Shares & Stocks (Bombay…