to download the file. You will need a PDF reader to view the files. You can download one for free from
|
S. 14A: Onus is on AO to show expenditure is incurred to earn tax-free income
For AY 2006-07, the assessee earned dividend of Rs. 17 lakhs and LTCG of Rs. 12 crores. The assessee claimed that it had incurred no expense to earn the tax-free income and so no s. 14A disallowance was permissible. However, the AO disallowed Rs. 2 crores under Rule 8D towards interest and admin expenditure. The CIT (A) accepted that no interest was incurred and deleted that disallowance. He also reduced the admin expenditure disallowance. On appeal to the Tribunal, HELD:
(i) The contention of the Revenue that some expenditure, directly or indirectly, is always incurred for earning tax-free income cannot be accepted. The burden is on the AO to establish the nexus of the expenditure incurred with the earning of exempt income before making any disallowance u/s 14A (Hero Cycles 323 ITR 518 (P&H), Jindal Photo followed)
(ii) As regards interest, the AO has to show the nexus between the borrowed funds and the tax free investments. If that is not done, disallowance of interest is not permissible (K. Raheja Corporation (Bom) followed)
(iii) As regards admin expenses, s. 14A disallowance cannot be made on an ad-hoc basis. It is the department’s responsibility to bring material on record to show that expenditure was incurred for earning the exempt income. If this is not done, disallowance is not permissible (Wimco Seedlings followed)
Dear Sirs
The cases which have been done under 143 (3) , are being reopened with the reason that expenses pertaining to exempted income has not been disallowed mainly after the audit objection .Even for the earlier Assessments the AO now wants to apply rule 8D, and if it is being told to them that it is only prospective, they work out the proportionate expenses of all expenses including administrative charges.HOW can this actin be stopped at the initial level?