| COURT: | |
| CORAM: | |
| SECTION(S): | |
| GENRE: | |
| CATCH WORDS: | |
| COUNSEL: | |
| DATE: | (Date of pronouncement) | 
| DATE: | April 9, 2008 (Date of publication) | 
| AY: | |
| FILE: | |
| CITATION: | |
The issue of notice under s. 16 (2) W. T. Act {s. 143 (2) I. T. Act} is mandatory for reassessment proceedings. If notice u/s 16 (2) {143 (2)} is not issued, the assessment order passed u/s 17 {s. 147} is not valid.
Note: Bandana Gagoi 289 ITR 28 (Gau) was followed.
See also: ACIT vs. Aurangabad Holiday Resorts (ITAT Pune), Atul Glass Industries vs. DCIT (ITAT Delhi), Vin Vish Corporation vs. ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) & Tulika Mishra vs. JCIT (ITAT Delhi).

[…] The judgement in Scindia (Bom HC) was […]