Please click on the categories to the right to find what you are looking for. Click on this icon to download the file. You will need a PDF reader to view the files. You can download one for free from Foxit 1.8 MB or from Adobe 20MB.

(1) For purposes of s. 145A, where an assessee follows the procedure laid down by the ICAI and the tax auditor reports in clause 12(b) of Form 3CD of the Tax Audit Report that no adjustment is required to be made on account of s. 145A, the unutilized modvat credit cannot be added to income.

 

(2) To give effect to s. 145A, the opening stock as of 1.4.1998 has to be increased by the amount of tax, duty, cess etc.

 

Note: Mahavir Aluminium 168 TM 27 (Del) followed.

 

See Also: Diamond Dyes (ITAT Bom).


Related Judgements

No related posts.

One Response to “Hawkins Cookers vs. ITO (ITAT Mumbai)”

  1. archives » Blog Archive » CIT vs. Mahalaxmi Glass (Bombay High Court) Says:

    [...] Also: Hawkins Cookers vs. ITO (ITAT Mumbai) Posted in All Judgements, High Court [...]

Subscribe To Our Newsletter