Mrs. Mudra Nanavati vs. DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)

Related Judgements

1. Saurabh Srivastava vs. DCIT (ITAT Delhi Special Bench) 

   Consideration received by an assessee for agreeing not to compete constitutes a capital receipt even though (i) the period of restraint is only 18 months and (ii) the assessee continued service with the payer-company as Managing Director.

2. Sumit Bhattacharya vs. ACIT (ITAT Mumbai Special Bench) 

   (i) Amounts received by an assessee from the foreign holding company of his employer company on redemption of stock appreciation rights, being “fruits of employment” is chargeable to tax as “salaries” despite the absence of an employer-employee relationship (ii) there … Sumit Bhattacharya vs. ACIT (ITAT Mumbai Special…

3. Amadeus Global Travel vs. DCIT (ITAT Delhi) 

   (i) The Amadeus system, by which subscribers in India are enabled to perform the functions of reservation and ticketing, represents a “business connection” because it extends to the Indian territory in the form of connectivity in India and generates income … Amadeus Global Travel vs. DCIT (ITAT Delhi)…

4. Rupee Finance vs. ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) 

   Where the assessee purchased shares at a price below the market price and the question was whether the difference between the market price and the purchase price can be assessed as unexplained investment u/s 69 or as a benefit u/s … Rupee Finance vs. ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) Read…

5. ACIT vs. Star India (ITAT Mumbai) 

   Deduction u/s 80-HHF (1) is available in respect of the ‘profits of the business’ which means the entire business profits and not only the profits derived from the export activity. Accordingly, deduction is allowable even if the export activity has resulted in a loss provided there is an overall…