Click Here For Best Books On Taxation & Law. Upto 60% Off On Select Titles. Free Shipping & Pay On Delivery!
 

Click Here To Subscribe To Our Free Newsletter

This section is now closed. Click here for new judgements

Home › All Judgements › Topsgrup Electronic Systems v ITO (ITAT Mumbai)

Topsgrup Electronic Systems v ITO (ITAT Mumbai)

Posted on by itatbar — No Comments ↓
COURT:
CORAM: ,
SECTION(S): , , ,
GENRE:
CATCH WORDS:
COUNSEL:
DATE: February 19, 2016 (Date of pronouncement)
DATE: April 5, 2016 (Date of publication)
AY: 2009-10
FILE: Click here to download the file in pdf format
CITATION:
Transfer Pricing - alleged excess investment in share capital of wholly owned subsidiary cannot be termed as loan and notional interest charged thereon

The Tribunal deleted TP addition on account of

a) alleged excess consideration paid on investment in share capital of wholly owned subsidiary re-characterized as loan

b) and notional interest thereon on the ground that

i. Chapter X of the Act is inapplicable to an international transaction on capital account which does not result in income chargeable to tax and

ii. Re-characterisation of the transaction is not permitted under the Act, and

iii. That potential income, to qualify as income subject to transfer pricing under the Act, should arise from the impugned international transaction which is before the TPO for consideration and not out of a hypothetical transaction that may or may not take place in the future.

Related Judgements

  1. Varian India Private Limited vs. Addl. DIT (ITAT Mumbai) 

    The assessee has used allocation key of employee head account. The expenses like rent, depreciation, electricity, insurance charges, office maintenance and other miscellaneous expenses have no co-relation with the number of employees. On the contrary, these expenses have a direct bearing to the revenue generation. … Varian India Private Limited vs. Addl. DIT…
  2. Goldstar Jewellery Limited vs. JCIT (ITAT Mumbai) 

    After the insertion of explanation to section 92B(1), the payment or deferred payment or receivable or any debt arising during the course of business fall under the expression international transaction as per explanation. Therefore, in view of the expanded meaning of the international transaction as contemplated under clause (i)…
  3. ITW India Limited vs. ACIT (ITAT Delhi) 

    The mandate of this section is to determine the ALP of ‘an’ international transaction. The term ‘transaction’ has been defined under rule 10A(d) to mean ‘a number of closely linked transactions’. It follows that the ALP of more than one transaction can be determined as one unit, only if…
  4. DCIT vs. Tata Consultancy Services Ltd (ITAT Mumbai) 

    (c) The AO erred in not himself examining the issue of Transfer Pricing and with the approval of the CIT, made a reference to the TPO u/s 92CA(1) of the Act; that the AO as well as the CIT failed to apply their mind to the TP Report filed…
  5. Headstrong Services India Pvt. Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Delhi) 

    No exception has been carved out by the statute for non-determination of the ALP of an international transaction of an assessee who is eligible for the benefit of deduction section 10A/10B or any other section of Chapter- VIA of the Act. Section 92(1) clearly provides that any income arising…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*