| COURT: | Bombay High Court |
| CORAM: | G. S. Kulkarni J, M. S. Sanklecha J |
| SECTION(S): | 119, 139(1) |
| GENRE: | Domestic Tax |
| CATCH WORDS: | Due date, Return of Income |
| COUNSEL: | Dr. K. Shivram, Rahul Hakani |
| DATE: | September 30, 2015 (Date of pronouncement) |
| DATE: | October 2, 2015 (Date of publication) |
| AY: | 2015-16 |
| FILE: | Click here to view full post with file download link |
| CITATION: | |
| Strictures passed against CBDT for causing ‘very unfair discrimination' between taxpayers by extending due date for filing ROI only for taxpayers in P&H and Gujarat and not for those in other States | |
Taking into account the fact that the decision of the Gujarat High Court and Punjab and Haryana High Court have been accepted by the CBDT issuing orders under Section 119 of the Act but very unfairly in case of an all India Statute restricting its benefit to only two States and one Union Territory. This itself warrants an extension of due date to the same date as is available for the assessees in Gujarat, Punjab and Haryana to avoid any discrimination to the assessees else where
Recent Comments