CIT vs. HCL Comnet (Supreme Court)

Related Judgements

1. DCIT vs. Gujarat Alkalies (Supreme Court) 

   Commitment charges paid in respect of borrowed moneys are allowable as a deduction u/s 37(1) of the Act.

2. JCIT vs. United Phosphorus (Supreme Court) 

   The question as to whether the assessee had an option in law to claim partial depreciation in respect of any block of assets is remanded to the High Court to consider in the light of Mahendra Mills 243 ITR 56 … JCIT vs. United Phosphorus (Supreme Court) Read…

3. Kvaerner John Brown vs. CIT (Supreme Court) 

   Jurisdiction u/s S. 143(1)(a) and 143 (1A) is confined to making “prima facie” adjustments. When there are conflicting judgments on interpretation of Section 80-O, it is not permissible to make “prima facie” adjustments u/s 143(1)(a) and consequently additional tax u/s 143(1A) is not payable.
   Read more ›

4. Agricultural PMC vs. CIT (Supreme Court) 

   Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee is not a “local authority” after insertion of the Explanation in Section 10(20) vide Finance Act, 2002 w.e.f. 1.4.2003 and is consequently not entitled to the benefit under Section 10 of the 1961 Act.
   Read more ›

5. CIT vs. Enron Oil & Gas (Supreme Court) 

   Where the assessee had entered into a production sharing contract with a consortium which was governed by section 42 of the Act and the assessee made contribution at a certain rate to the consortium whereas the expenditure incurred out of the said contribution stood converted on the basis of…