M/s Sainath Enterprises vs. ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) (Third Member)

Related Judgements

1. Sumanlata Bansal vs. ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) (Third Member) 

   There is no specific provision in the Act requiring the assessment made under section 153A to be after issue of notice under section 143(2) of the Act. Learned counsel for the assessee places heavy reliance on the judgment of the Hon‟ble Supreme Court in Hotel Blue Moon v. DCIT…

2. Mangalam Drugs & Organics Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) 

   It is further noted, from the perusal of penalty order, that the penalty has been levied, on all the additions/disallowances, in a ‘whole sale’ manner. The AO has not given his findings, for levying the penalty, for each issue separately, with respect to the satisfaction of the AO for…

3. Dimension Data Asia Pacific Pte Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) 

   The Tribunal granted 100 percent stay of demand because (a) The assessed income was more than 10 times the returned income. (Instruction 96 of 1969 was relied upon) & (b) The stand taken by the AO was at variance with the stand taken by TPORead more ›

4. DCIT vs. Fritz D. Silva (ITAT Mumbai) 

   Interest payable on moneys borrowed for acquisition of shares should be added to the cost of acquisition of shares for the purpose of computing capital gains (Macintosh Finance Estates Ltd vs. ACIT (2007) 12 S0T 324 (Mum) (Trib) not followed, CIT vs. Trishul Investments Ltd (2008) 305 …

5. Dilip Manhar Parekh vs. DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) 

   The demolition of the structure would not constitute a transfer of the assets in terms of Section 54(3) of the Act in view of the decision of the Apex Court in the matter of Vania Silk Mills P. Ltd. v. CIT, reported in 191 ITR 647. In the above…