Click Here For Best Books On Taxation & Law. Upto 60% Off On Select Titles. Free Shipping & Pay On Delivery!
 

Click Here To Subscribe To Our Free Newsletter

This section is now closed. Click here for new judgements

Home › All Judgements › CIT vs. Indian Hotels Co Ltd (Supreme Court)

CIT vs. Indian Hotels Co Ltd (Supreme Court)

Posted on by editor
COURT:
CORAM:
SECTION(S):
GENRE:
CATCH WORDS:
COUNSEL:
DATE: (Date of pronouncement)
DATE: June 22, 2011 (Date of publication)
AY:
FILE:
CITATION:

Click here to download the judgement (indian_hotels_condonation_delay.pdf)


Long Delay due to procedural reasons in filing Dept appeals cannot be condoned

The department filed a SLP challenging the order of the Bombay High Court declining to condone delay of 656 days in filing the appeal. The delay was explained as having been caused by “several facts such as non traceability of case records, procedural formalities involved in the Department and the papers are to be processed through different officers in rank for their comments, approval etc. and then the preparation of the draft of appeal memo, paper book and the administrative difficulties such as shortage of staff“. HELD dismissing the SLP:

In our opinion, the said explanation does not make out a sufficient cause for condonation of delay in filing the appeal before the High Court. In that view of the matter, we do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned judgment. The Special Leave Petition is dismissed on the ground of delay as well as on merits.

Note: Contrast with CIT vs. West Bengal Infrastructure Development Finance Corp (Supreme Court) where it was held that high-revenue department appeals should not be dismissed for delay. See also Dept’s guidelines for “zero delay regime”

Related Judgements

  1. Sudarshan Silks vs. CIT (Supreme Court) 

    The Tribunal deleted penalty on the finding that the assessee had been induced to offer undisclosed income on the assurance that penalty would not be levied. The frame of the question raised by the department in its appeal to the High Court did not challenge the perversity of the…
  2. Sree Ayyanar Spinning vs. CIT (Supreme Court) 

    Once the assessee has moved the rectification application within four years from the date of the appeal order, the Tribunal cannot reject that application on the ground that four years have lapsed, which includes the period of pendency of the application before the Tribunal.The Tribunal is bound to decide…
  3. The Totgars’ Cooperative vs. ITO (Supreme Court) 

    The interest on surplus invested in short-term deposits, not being attributable to the business of providing credit facilities to the members or marketing of agricultural produce of the members, is assessable as “other income” and not as “business profits”. The words “the whole of the amount of profits and…
  4. UOI vs. R. Gandhi (Supreme Court – 5 Judges) 

    Parliament is competent to constitute Tribunals for special Acts. However, the failure to ensure independence of judiciary and separation of judicial and executive power renders the Company Law Tribunal unconstitutional. Suggestions given on how to remedy the defects Read more ›
  5. CERC vs. National Hydroelectric Power Corp (Supreme Court) 

    In addition to normal mode of service, service of Notice(s) may be effected by E-Mail for which the advocate(s) on-record will, at the time of filing of petition/appeal, furnish to the filing counter a soft copy of the entire petition/appeal in PDF formatRead more ›

Discover more from itatonline.org

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading