Aztec Software vs. ACIT (Karnataka High Court)

Related Judgements

1. CIT vs. Saumya Leasing (Bombay High Court) 

   Deduction under section 80M can be claimed even in respect of the interim dividend declared for the succeeding financial year before the due date.

2. Comed Laboratories vs. UOI (Gujarat High Court) 

   Writ petitions were filed challenging the constitutional validity of the provisions of Section 245HA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 under which the petitioners’ applications before the Settlement Commission are to be treated as having abated on account of failure of the Settlement Commission to pass orders under Section…

3. Dabur India Ltd vs. CIT (Delhi High Court) 

   While computing normal profits which do not involve Ch VI-A relief, an assessee is entitled not to claim depreciation. However, where deduction under Ch VI-A is claimed depreciation is mandatory. Read more ›

4. CIT vs. Rampur Engineering (Delhi High Court – Full Bench) 

   The judgement of the Division Bench in CIT v. Ram Commercial Enterprises Ltd. (2000) 246 ITR 568 (Delhi) holding that penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act cannot be levied where the authority initiating the penalty proceedings had not recorded its satisfaction regarding concealment of…

5. Mayawati vs. CIT (Delhi High Court) 

   S. 149, which imposes the limitation period, requires the notice to be “issued” but not “served” within the limitation period. Once a notice is issued within the period of limitation, jurisdiction becomes vested in the AO to proceed to reassess. Service is not a condition precedent to conferment of…