Balmukund Acharya vs. DCIT (Bombay High Court)

COURT:
CORAM:
SECTION(S):
GENRE:
CATCH WORDS:
COUNSEL:
DATE: (Date of pronouncement)
DATE: January 1, 2009 (Date of publication)
AY:
FILE:
CITATION:

The AO should not take advantage of the assessee’s ignorance of the law.

Where the assessee erroneously offered capital gains to tax and the same was accepted by the AO vide Intimation u/s 143 (1)(a) and the assessee thereafter filed an appeal against such assessment of capital gains and the same was held not maintainable by the Tribunal, HELD, reversing the order of the Tribunal that:

(1) In view of the Explanation to s. 143 (prior to its deletion w.e.f. 1.6.1999) an Intimation is deemed to be an appealable order and appeal is maintainable;

(2) The authorities under the Act are under an obligation to act in accordance with law. Tax can be collected only as provided under the Act. If any assessee, under a mistake, misconceptions or on not being properly instructed is over assessed, the authorities under the Act are required to assist him and ensure that only legitimate taxes due are collected. If particular levy is not permitted under the Act, tax cannot be levied applying the doctrine of estoppel.

Discover more from itatonline.org

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading