C M Mahadeva vs. CIT (Karnataka High Court)

Related Judgements

1. M/s Kothari Metals vs. ITO (Karnataka High Court) 

   The question of non-furnishing the reasons for re-opening an already concluded assessment goes to the very root of the matter. Since such reasons had not been furnished to the appellant, even though a request for the same had been made, we are of the opinion that proceedings for the…

2. Dr. Ajit Gupta vs. ACIT (Delhi High Court) 

   Since the action of the Revenue was based on a factually erroneous premise, the Court is of the view that the reopening of the assessments for the said AYs is not sustainable in law. The Court is also satisfied that the requirement of the law, as explained by the…

3. CIT vs. AMCO Power Systems Ltd (Karnataka High Court) 

   The purpose of Section 79 of the Act would be that benefit of carry forward and set-off of business losses for previous years of a company should not be misused by any new owner, who may purchase the shares of the Company, only to get the benefit of set-off…

4. CIT vs. Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagar Palike (Karnataka High Court) 

   The concept of tax deduction at source (TDS) and depositing the same with the Revenue is where payment is made by cash, cheque, demand draft or any other similar mode. When such payment in terms of money is made, the deduction is to be made by the person responsible…

5. K. S. Venkatesh vs. DCIT (Karnataka High Court) 

   The Assessing Officer sought to rectify the original assessment order on the ground that carried forward business loss was to the tune of Rs. 24,23,760/- and same had been set off against the total income which was inclusive of the income earned by the assessee under the head “Income…