COURT: | ITAT Cochin |
CORAM: | B. P. Jain (AM), George George K (JM) |
SECTION(S): | 37(1) |
GENRE: | Domestic Tax |
CATCH WORDS: | capital expenditure, capital vs. revenue expenditure, strategic investment |
COUNSEL: | Gautam Jain |
DATE: | January 10, 2017 (Date of pronouncement) |
DATE: | January 11, 2017 (Date of publication) |
AY: | 2010-11 |
FILE: | Click here to view full post with file download link |
CITATION: | |
S. 37(1): The loss on sale of shares of a wholly-owned subsidiary is allowable as a business loss if the investment in the subsidiary was made for commercial purposes |
The objective of ATAG was undertaking sales and marketing related activities for the brand of the appellant in Singapore. The said factual assertion has not been rebutted by the AO in the impugned assessment order. There is nothing on record to show that the said subsidiary company was doing any activity completely independent and unrelated to the activities carried out by the appellant company. Thus, the claim of the appellant that the investment was made for commercial purposes and not for purpose of accretion of investment cannot be rejected
Recent Comments