COURT: | ITAT Mumbai |
CORAM: | I. C. Sudhir (JM), Prashant Maharishi (AM) |
SECTION(S): | 271(1)(c) |
GENRE: | Domestic Tax |
CATCH WORDS: | CIT (DR), Departmental Representative |
COUNSEL: | Prakash Chand Yadav |
DATE: | June 21, 2016 (Date of pronouncement) |
DATE: | September 8, 2016 (Date of publication) |
AY: | 2006-07 |
FILE: | Click here to view full post with file download link |
CITATION: | |
As per CBDT Instruction No. 9/2013 dated 22.07.2013, appeals against imposition of penalty or levy of interest in which the aggregate of penalty imposed or interest levied by the AO is more than Rs. 3 crore in the cities of Mumbai and Delhi are to be argued by the CIT(DR) and matters other than this are to be argued by the Senior DR |
As per CBDT Instruction No. 9/2013 dated 22.07.2013, appeals against imposition of penalty or levy of interest in which the aggregate of penalty imposed or interest levied by the AO is more than Rs. 3 crore in the cities of Mumbai and Delhi are to be argued by the CIT(DR) and matters other than this are to be argued by the Senior DR
Recent Comments