| COURT: | Madras High Court |
| CORAM: | R. Karuppiah J, R. Sudhakar J |
| SECTION(S): | 2(47)(vi) |
| GENRE: | Domestic Tax |
| CATCH WORDS: | capital gains, Power of Attorney, transfer |
| COUNSEL: | Ex-parte |
| DATE: | November 3, 2014 (Date of pronouncement) |
| DATE: | November 14, 2014 (Date of publication) |
| AY: | 2009-10 |
| FILE: | Click here to view full post with file download link |
| CITATION: | |
| S. 2(47)(vi): A Power of Attorney which does not enable enjoyment of property does not result in a "transfer". CBDT Circular No.495 dated 22.9.1987 reads more into s. 2(47)(vi) than warranted | |
(i) There is no transfer to or enabling enjoyment of property in favour of the assessee in any manner and therefore, sub-clause (vi) of Section 2(47) of the Income Tax Act does not get attracted. Clause 21 of the power …
Recent Comments