CIT vs. Saurabh Enterprises (Allahabad High Court)

Related Judgements

1. Peninsula Land vs. CIT (Bombay High Court) 

   An order passed by the AO to give consequential effect to an appeallate order of an earlier year is not an order passed under section 154 and consequently the time limit of section 154(7) does not apply. Read more ›

2. CCE vs. Shruti Colorants (Bombay High Court) 

   As s. 35-G of the Central Excise Act (and s. 130 of the Customs Act) provides that an appeal to the High Court shall be filed within 180 days of the receipt of the order appealed against and there is no provision for condonation of delay the court has…

3. DIT vs. KLM Royal Dutch Airlines (Delhi High Court) 

   Where the assessee was a company incorporated in the Netherlands and its main activity was operation of aircrafts in international traffic both for transport of passengers and cargo and its income was exempt under the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement between India and the Netherlands and it recovered charges from…

4. DIT vs. Oman International Bank (Bombay High Court) 

   Held, affirming the majority view of the Special Bench in DCIT vs. Oman International Bank 100 ITD 285 that:

    

   (i) Though the Circulars issued by the CBDT are not binding on the court as held in CCE vs. Ratan Melting & Wire Industries 231 ELT 22 (S.C.), it is binding…

5. Madhushree Gupta vs. UOI (Delhi High Court) 

   The Revenue’s submission that prima facie satisfaction of the AO need not be reflected at the stage of initiation is not acceptable. The presence of prima facie satisfaction for initiation of penalty proceedings was and remains a jurisdictional fact which cannot be wished away even post amendment. If an…