| COURT: | Delhi High Court |
| CORAM: | Sanjeev Narula J, Vipin Sangi J |
| SECTION(S): | 254(2A) |
| GENRE: | Domestic Tax |
| CATCH WORDS: | priority hearing, stay of demand |
| COUNSEL: | Ankul Goyal, Ruchir Bhatia |
| DATE: | October 21, 2019 (Date of pronouncement) |
| DATE: | November 2, 2019 (Date of publication) |
| AY: | 2011-12 |
| FILE: | Click here to view full post with file download link |
| CITATION: | |
| S. 254(2A): In cases where there is stay of recovery of demand of tax, the Tribunal should deal with the appeals pending before it on a higher priority. The Tribunal should consider forming a separate list of such cases which should be heard on priority after arranging the cases on the basis of their seniority as well as the quantum involved in the stay | |
We are of the considered view that in cases where there is stay of recovery of demand of tax, the Tribunal should deal with the appeals pending before it on a higher priority. The Tribunal should consider forming a separate list of such cases which should be heard on priority after arranging the cases on the basis of their seniority as well as the quantum involved in the stay
Recent Comments