| COURT: | Bombay High Court |
| CORAM: | Dr. Shalini Phansalkar-Joshi J, V. M. Kanade J |
| SECTION(S): | 143(3), 201 |
| GENRE: | Domestic Tax |
| CATCH WORDS: | strictures, TDS credit |
| COUNSEL: | Arun Ganesh Jogdeo |
| DATE: | August 28, 2015 (Date of pronouncement) |
| DATE: | October 13, 2015 (Date of publication) |
| AY: | - |
| FILE: | Click here to view full post with file download link |
| CITATION: | |
| Dept directed to follow directions of Delhi High Court in 352 ITR 273 and to be vigilant and ensure that such mistakes do not occur. Dept directed to set up a self-auditing vigilance cell to redress taxpayers' grievances | |
The Income Tax authorities shall follow the directions given by the Delhi High Court in case of Court On Its Own Motion v. Commissioner of Income-tax 352 ITR 273 in other cities, including the city of Mumbai, in Maharashtra State. We hope and trust that the Income Tax Department will be more vigilant and ensure that such mistakes will not occur in future. We also direct the Income Tax Department to form a Vigilance Cell to ensure that there is a monitoring authority, which would monitor various policy decisions which are taken and a self auditing mechanism is required to be formulated to ensure that the income tax assessees are not made to run from pillar to post for the purpose of redressal of their grievances
Recent Comments