COURT: | Supreme Court |
CORAM: | Adarsh Kumar Goel J, Jagdish Singh Khehar J. |
SECTION(S): | Cr. P. C |
GENRE: | Other Laws |
CATCH WORDS: | Advocates |
COUNSEL: | Attorney General |
DATE: | September 10, 2015 (Date of pronouncement) |
DATE: | September 14, 2015 (Date of publication) |
AY: | - |
FILE: | Click here to view full post with file download link |
CITATION: | |
Law Commission and the Bar Council of India should consider whether Advocates should be tested for fitness and competence to argue matters |
The interest of justice may suffer if the counsel conducting the trial is physically or mentally unfit on account of any disability. The interest of the society is paramount and instead of trials being conducted again on account of unfitness of the counsel, reform may appear to be necessary so that such a situation does not arise. Perhaps time has come to review the Advocates Act and the relevant Rules to examine the continued fitness of an advocate to conduct a criminal trial on account of advanced age or other mental or physical infirmity, to avoid grievance that an Advocate who conducted trial was unfit or incompetent. This is an aspect which needs to be looked into by the concerned authorities including the Law Commission and the Bar Council of India
Recent Comments