| COURT: | ITAT Mumbai |
| CORAM: | A. D. Jain (JM), Rajendra (AM) |
| SECTION(S): | 92C, 92CA |
| GENRE: | Transfer Pricing |
| CATCH WORDS: | Transfer Pricing |
| COUNSEL: | Dinesh Vyas |
| DATE: | November 4, 2015 (Date of pronouncement) |
| DATE: | November 17, 2015 (Date of publication) |
| AY: | 2005-06 |
| FILE: | Click here to view full post with file download link |
| CITATION: | |
| Transfer Pricing: (i) If the AO & CIT make a mechanical reference to the TPO without applying mind to the TP report & other data filed by the assessee, the reference is invalid, (ii) A transfer pricing adjustment cannot be made if the assessee's income is exempt u/s 10A or 80HHE or (iii) if the AE is assessed at a rate of tax higher that tax rate in India | |
(c) The AO erred in not himself examining the issue of Transfer Pricing and with the approval of the CIT, made a reference to the TPO u/s 92CA(1) of the Act; that the AO as well as the CIT failed to apply their mind to the TP Report filed by the assessee, or to any other material or information or document furnished. The TPO made an adjustment which was incorporated by the AO in the assessment order. Thereby, the AO as well as the CIT did not discharge necessary respective judicial functions conferred on them under sections 92C and 92CA of the Act;
(d) Further, the assessee is also correct in contending that no TP adjustment can be made in a case like the present one, where the assessee enjoys u/s 10A or 80HHE of the Act, or where the tax rate in the country of the Associated Enterprises is higher than the rate of tax in India and where the establishment of tax avoidance or manipulation of prices or establishment of shifting of profits is not possible.
Recent Comments