COURT: | Bombay High Court |
CORAM: | M. S. Sanklecha J, M. S. Sonak J |
SECTION(S): | 220(6) |
GENRE: | Domestic Tax |
CATCH WORDS: | stay of demand |
COUNSEL: | Madhur Agrawal, S.E. Dastur |
DATE: | October 29, 2014 (Date of pronouncement) |
DATE: | December 4, 2014 (Date of publication) |
AY: | 2011-12 |
FILE: | Click here to view full post with file download link |
CITATION: | |
S. 220(6): Parameters to be considered in deciding a stay application laid down |
The parameters to be considered in deciding stay application as laid down by this Court in KEC International Limited v/s. B. R. Balakrishnan 251 ITR 158; UTI Mutual Funds v/s. ITO 345 ITR 71 and UTI Mutual Fund v/s. ITO …
Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority vs. DDIT (Bombay High Court) Read More »
Recent Comments