| COURT: | ITAT Chandigarh |
| CORAM: | Annapurna Gupta (AM), Sanjay Garg (JM) |
| SECTION(S): | 254 |
| GENRE: | Domestic Tax |
| CATCH WORDS: | stay of demand, strictures |
| COUNSEL: | Meghraj |
| DATE: | April 6, 2018 (Date of pronouncement) |
| DATE: | April 10, 2018 (Date of publication) |
| AY: | 2013-14 |
| FILE: | Click here to view full post with file download link |
| CITATION: | |
| Strictures passed against the Dept for confronting, showing resentment and displeasure to the Tribunal for granting interim stay against recovery of demand. The Dept is showing open defiance of, disrespect of, or of open resentment to, orders of the Tribunal, which may prove be very dangerous for the sanctity of the courts of law/Justice dispensation system of the country. Costs imposed on dept | |
The crux of our above discussion is that the department officials fully knowing that no useful purpose will be served either by moving the present application and even knowing that the present application was infructuous and non-maintainable even on the date of its filing, not only filed this application, but also insisted for arguments despite that the hearing on the main appeal had already been concluded on a previous date. The only motive behind this application is to confront and show resentment and displeasure to this Tribunal for granting interim stay against recovery in this matter. The wording of the opening part of the application for vacation of stay clearly reveals that the Department is showing her resentment not only about the passing of ex-parte interim stay order but also towards the directions of the Tribunal for directing her to refund the amount illegally recovered
Recent Comments