| COURT: | ITAT Cochin |
| CORAM: | Abraham P. George (AM), George George K (JM) |
| SECTION(S): | 194C, 40(a)(i) |
| GENRE: | Domestic Tax |
| CATCH WORDS: | income, Reimbursement of expenses, TDS disallowance |
| COUNSEL: | Prasanth Srinivas |
| DATE: | June 15, 2017 (Date of pronouncement) |
| DATE: | July 29, 2017 (Date of publication) |
| AY: | 2011-12 |
| FILE: | Click here to view full post with file download link |
| CITATION: | |
| S. 40(a)(ia): Amounts paid by way of reimbursement of expenses do not constitute income in the hands of the recipient. Consequently, the payer is under no obligation to deduct TDS u/s 194C and no disallowance of the expenditure can be made u/s 40(a)(ia). CBDT Circular No.715 dated 08.08.1995 distinguished | |
The Tribunal, while giving the above decision, had also considered the effect of CBDT Circular No.715 dated 08.08.1995 and also ruled that the said Circular was applicable only where consolidated bills were raised inclusive of contractual payments and re-imbursement of actual expenditure. Same view was taken by the Bangalore Bench of this Tribunal in the case of DCIT vs. Dhanyaa Seeds (P) Ltd. (supra). Hon’ble Gujarat High Court in the case of Pr. CIT vs. Consumer Marketing (India) (P.) Ltd.(supra) held that when separate bills are there for reimbursement of expenditure received by C&F agent, TDS was not required to be made on reimbursement
Recent Comments