COURT: | ITAT Lucknow |
CORAM: | Sarathi Chaudhury (JM), T. S. Kapoor (AM) |
SECTION(S): | 271(1)(c) |
GENRE: | Domestic Tax |
CATCH WORDS: | concelment Penalty, furnishing inaccurate particulars of income |
COUNSEL: | Ex-parte |
DATE: | January 16, 2018 (Date of pronouncement) |
DATE: | January 24, 2018 (Date of publication) |
AY: | 2012-13 |
FILE: | Click here to view full post with file download link |
CITATION: | |
S. 271(1)(c) penalty: Though capital gains was not disclosed in the return, if tax on the same is paid after the s. 147 assessment order is passed, there is no loss to the Revenue and it also shows the bona fides of the assessee and penalty cannot be levied. The fact that if the s. 148 notice was not issued, the assessee would have got away with tax evasion does not mean that his action was not bona fide |
At the very outset, we observe that as appearing on record, in the return filed by the assessee the tax on sale of immoveable property was not paid or entered into. However, when notice under section 148 of the Act was issued, assessee himself attended the proceedings and thereafter paid the entire tax on the same date when the assessment order was finalized. This element of behaviour on the part of the assessee shows that when he had filed the return, there was some omission on the part of the assessee to include the tax on the sale of property. However, when he received notice under section 148 of the Act, he was very eager to know what mistake has been committed by him and, therefore, he himself attended the hearing before the Assessing Officer and on coming to know about the amount of tax payable, has immediately paid tax on the same date. He has not even challenged the assessment order and has accepted the assessment as passed by the Assessing Officer and paid due tax. Therefore, there is no loss to the Revenue.
Recent Comments