Mittal Tower Premises vs. ITO (ITAT Mumbai)

Related Judgements

1. Manoj Aggarwal vs. DCIT (ITAT Delhi 5 Member Spl Bench) 

   It is a precondition to invoking s. 158BD that the AO must, in the course of s. 158BC proceedings, record satisfaction that the income belongs to the other person. In the absence of such finding, s. 158BD cannot be invoked. The satisfaction must be objective and not subjective….

2. DCIT vs. MDS Switchgear (ITAT Mumbai) 

   Where the AO had granted deduction under sections 80HH & 80-I in the year of formation of the new industrial undertaking, he could not, in a subsequent year, deny the deduction on the ground that the conditions are not fulfilled, if he has not withdrawn the deduction granted in…

3. ACIT vs. Bright Star Investment (ITAT Mumbai) 

   Of the two formulas available, the formula adopted by the assessee, i.e. of taking the difference between the indexed book value on the date of conversion and the sale proceeds as long-term capital gains, being beneficial to the assessee, should be adopted. No part of the gains can be…

4. L. G. Cable Ltd vs. DDIT (6.2 MB) (ITAT Delhi) 

   Where the assessee, a Korean company, had entered into two contracts, one for on-shore execution of a fiber optic system and the other for offshore supply and services and it had a project office in India and the question arose whether any part of the profits from offshore supply…

5. UPS Freight Services vs. ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) 

   As the 3rd Provio to s. 245 (2A) {restricting the right of the Tribunal to grant stay beyond 365 days even if the delay is not attributable to the assessee} comes into force on 1.10.2008, there is no bar on the Tribunal before that date to grant stay beyond…