You can check the case status at https://itat.gov.in/judicial/casestatus if you are not able to go to the ITAT's office. (read more)

The transaction here is an "exchange". U/s 50, the consideration for the transferred shop (FMV of the new shop) will have to be reduced from the WDV of the block of assets. The new shop will have to be added to the block. The surplus, if any, will have to be offered to tax. As… (read more)

Yes. A relinquishment for consideration is a transfer of a capital asset and will attract capital gains. The cost paid by the father and his period of holding will be deemed to be the cost and holding period of the brothers. (read more)

In my view it would qualify under Article 52 as a release concerning ancestral or joint family property. In this case, HUF property is held as joint family assets and should qualify as ancestral property for stamp duty purposes. The daughter constitutes a female coparcener. She is relinquishing her undivided share/interest in this HUF property… (read more)

In the hands of the donor, a gift will not give rise to capital gains as it is not a "transfer" u/s 47(iii). In the hands of the recipient, gifts from relatives are exempt u/s 56(2). Daughter-in-law qualifies as a relative. The cost and holding period of the donor will be deemed to be that… (read more)

Under Article 52 of Schedule I to the Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958, a release deed (relinquishment deed) for ancestral property executed by or in favour of specified close blood relatives (or their legal heirs) without consideration attracts a nominal stamp duty of ₹200. However, in your case, the property is not "ancestral" but is self-acquired… (read more)

S. 273B refers to "reasonable cause" which depends on the facts of the case. Amongst the landmark judgements, you can consider Hindustan Steel Ltd. v. State of Orissa (1972) 83 ITR 26 (SC) which is a foundational judgment on penalties. The Supreme Court held that penalty is not automatic for every breach. It is a… (read more)

It appears to be a mistake. You will have to see their CCS rules. However, generally the position is that the earlier encashment is not deducted. You will have to file a representation and ask for reasons and reconsideration. If this fails you will have to approach the CAT. (read more)

Generally speaking, evidence in income tax investigations must be relevant, reliable, and obtained/handled in compliance with the Income-tax Act and procedural rules. (read more)

The new flat received from the developer itself qualifies as the reinvestment (“construction” of a new residential house) for purposes of s.54 and exempts the capital gains arising on redevelopment of the old flat. Alternatively, the assessee can use his funds to buy or construct a totally separate flat/ house. In either case, the qualifying… (read more)