Category: Tax Laws

Archive for the ‘Tax Laws’ Category


Vinil Venugopal v. DDIT (Inv.), FAIU-4(1) ( SB ) (Mum) ( Trib) www.itatonline .org Ranjeeta Vinil v. DDIT (Inv.), FAIU-4(1)( SB ). ( Mum)( Trib) www.itatonline .org

Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and Imposition of Tax Act, 2015

S. 43 : Penalty for failure to furnish return of income or furnish inaccurate particulars of an asset ( Including financial interest in any entity ) outside India- Non-disclosure of foreign assets – Use of word “may” in section 43 is directory and not mandatory – Assessing Officer has discretion to impose or waive penalty depending on facts – Mere failure to disclose foreign investment does not automatically warrant penalty – Interpretation of statutes . [S. 46(3)]

Ramakrishna Mills (CBE) Ltd. v. JCIT (2025) 476 ITR 161 /173 taxmann.com 918 (Mad) (HC)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-
book profits-Prior-period expenses-Hyper-technical Revision order directing addition of such amount in book profits, unsustainable-Order of Tribunal was set aside. [S. 115JA,260A]

Deepak Jain v. ACIT ( Delhi)(Trib) www . itatonline ,org

Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) Act , 2015 .

S. 10(3) :Assessment – Charge of tax Undisclosed foreign asset – Asset ceased before 1.7.2015 – Not taxable – Penalty – Non-disclosure of asset – Ceased before AY 2012–13 -Penalty not leviable. – Doctrine of election/approbate and reprobate- Once proceedings under the IT Act are consciously chosen, the Revenue cannot subsequently invoke BMA. [ S. 2(11), 3(1) , 41, 43 ,BMA Valuation Rule, 3, Income tax Act , 1961 , S. 90, 131(IA), 132, 132(4) , 132(4A) , 292C ]

Rashesh Manhar Bhansali. v. ACIT (2025) 212 ITD 210 (Mum) (Trib.) Editorial : Rashesh Manhar Bhansali v . Add.CIT ( 2022)193 ITD 141 ( Mum)( Trib) , recalled .

Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and Imposition of Tax Act, 2015 (BMA) .

S.18:Appeal to Appellate Tribunal – Rectification of mistake apparent from the record – Failure to consider written submission- Mistake apparent from record – Order is recalled – Tribunal in the original order Rashesh Manhar Bhansali v . Add.CIT ( 2022)193 ITD 141 ( Mum)( Trib) has up held the provisions of the Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income & Assets) and Imposition of Tax Act, 2015 can indeed be pressed into service in respect of an undisclosed foreign asset or income even if it was already in the knowledge of any Governmental authorities, other than the jurisdictional Assessing Officer, as at the point when the said legislation came into force. Accounts not in existence at the Black Money Act, 2015 came into force – The new legislation operates for those accounts and assets too.[ S. 2(11), 5(1)(i),18(7),40(1 ), 40(2) , ITAct , 132(4),254(2) R. 3(1)( e)]

C. Prasannakumaran Unnithan v. CIT [2023] 156 taxmann.com 397/ (2025) 342 CTR 684 / (2024) 244 DTR 295 (Ker)(HC) Editorial : C. Prasannakumaran Unnithan v.CIT [2024] 169 taxmann.com 136 / (2025) 342 CTR 678 / (2024) 244 DTR 289 (Ker)(HC), division bench modified the condition of deposit of 20 per cent.

S. 250 : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Procedure-Sufficient opportunity was provided-Writ petition is dismissed-If the assessee deposits 20 per cent of the assessed tax, the stay application shall be decided within a period of one month from the date of filing of the appeal before Tribunal and stay application.[S. 253, Art. 226.

Seth Chagan Mall Hira Lakll Dugar Charitable Trust v. ITO, (E) (2025) 210 ITD 266 (Kol.)(Trib.)

S. 11 : Property held for charitable purposes-Failure to file Form No 9A along with the return-Filed later on-Denial of exemption is not justified. [S.11(2)(ii), 139, Form No 9A]

Hindalco Industries Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2024)114 ITR 502 (Mum)(Trib)

S.80IA: Industrial undertakings-Enterprises engaged in infrastructure development-Captive power plant-Supply of power to own unit-Sale of small portion to State grid corporation-Rate to be adopted-Market value-Rate at which State Electricity Board supplies to industrial consumers. [S.80IA(8)]

PCIT v. Khyathi Steel Industries Pvt. Ltd. (2024) 469 ITR 579 (Karn)(HC)

S. 68 : Cash credits-Share capital-Identity of investors and source of income established-Deletion of addition is affirmed.[S. 260A]

Genpact India (P) Ltd. v. ACIT (2024) 341 CTR 30 /242 DTR 267 / 301 Taxman 126 / ( 2025) 474 ITR 48 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Limitation-Notice issued on 27-5-2022 under section 148A(b) was not in continuation of reopening notice under section 148 dated 30-6-2021-Reopening assessment for assessment year 2015-16, is in contravention of first proviso to section 149(1) and is barred by limitation.[S. 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), 149(1)(b), Art. 226]

Atul Roshanlal Gupta v .PCIT (2024) 167 Taxmann.com 634 / 341 CTR 569 / 242 DTR 433 / 8 NYPCTR 1170 (Guj)(HC)

Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020

S.4: Filing of declaration and particulars to be furnished – Amount payable by declarant – Eligible assessee- Pendency of appeal – Rejection of declaration- Appeal filed by the assessee in the year 2015 was not pending as on 31st Jan., 2020—Order passed by the Tribunal recalling the order – Appeal of the assessee has to be considered as pending as on 31st Jan., 2020 which is the specified date as per the VSV Act— Order of rejection is quashed . [S. 3 , 5(2), ITAct , S. 254(1), Art. 226 ]