archives » Snowcem vs. DCIT (Bombay High Court)» Latest unreported judgements

Please click on the categories to the right to find what you are looking for. Click on this icon to download the file. You will need a PDF reader to view the files. You can download one for free from Foxit 1.8 MB or from Adobe 20MB.

If you are looking for judgements filed prior to January 2008, please click the respective links for: Supreme Court judgements, High Court judgements and Tribunal judgements.

S. 115JA assessment is not liable for advance tax interest u/ss 234B and 234C.

 

(i) Where an assessment is made u/s 115JA of the Act, an assessee is not liable to pay interest for non-payment/shortfall of advance tax u/ss 234B and 234C of the Act. CIT v. Kwality Biscuits Ltd 284 ITR 434 (SC) followed;

 

(ii) There is a difference between dismissal of a Special Leave Petition and dismissal of an Appeal. While the dismissal of a SLP does not result in merger of the judgment of the High Court with that of the Supreme Court and there is no affirmation, the dismissal of an Appeal results in an affirmation and merger of the order of the High Court into that of the Supreme Court.

 

Note: In CIT v. Kwality Biscuits Ltd 284 ITR 434 (SC) the Court was concerned with s. 115J of the Act.


Related Judgements

  1. Kanel Oil vs. JCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad Third Member) 

    The judgement of the Special Bench in Ashima Syntex Ltd 117 ITD 1 has to be followed in preference to the judgement of the Bombay High Court in Snowcem India Ltd 313 ITR 170 and it has to be held that the assessee was liable to pay interest u/ss…

Comments are closed.