DCIT vs. Overseas Infrastructures (ITAT Mumbai)

Related Judgements

1. ITO vs. Neelkanth Finbuild Ltd (ITAT Delhi) 

   Once the identity of the share holder have been established, even if there is a case of bogus share capital, it cannot be added in the hands of company unless any adverse evidence is not on record. It is a certain law that the assessee is to prove the…

2. ACIT vs. Dhanlaxmi Equipment Pvt. Ltd (ITAT Jaipur) 

   The Assessing Officer had not considered the evidence filed by the assessee during the course of assessment proceedings i.e. affidavits confirming the transaction, PAN number, complete addresses of creditors, copy of balance sheet, ITR for A.Y. 2008-09, bank statement and form No. 18. The assessee had discharged its onus…

3. Bharat Dana Bera vs. ITO (ITAT Mumbai) 

   The assessee failed to establish the genuineness of these liabilities by producing supporting evidence. Simply the liabilities being reflected against certain names in the books of account would not establish the genuineness of liabilitiesRead more ›

4. Panna S. Khatau vs. ITO (ITAT Mumbai) 

   When an amount, which is stated, claimed and accepted as a payable, is no longer so, the assessee gains to that extent. There is nothing unreal or notional about this gain. What is admitted though is that there has been remission/cessation of liability in-as-much as these are no longer…

5. Hitender Pal Singh vs. ITO (ITAT Delhi) 

   In this case, the assessee had given the names and addresses of the alleged creditors. It was in the knowledge of the Revenue that the said creditors were income-tax assessees. Their index numbers were in the file of the Revenue. The Revenue, apart from issuing notices under s. 131…