Pankaj Extrusion Ltd vs. ACIT (Gujarat High Court)

COURT:
CORAM:
SECTION(S):
GENRE:
CATCH WORDS:
COUNSEL:
DATE: (Date of pronouncement)
DATE: March 2, 2011 (Date of publication)
AY:
FILE:
CITATION:

Click here to download the judgement (pankaj_extrusion_DRP_TP_void.pdf)


S. 144C order cannot be passed if no transfer pricing adjustments made by TPO

The TPO passed an order u/s 92CA (3) stating that the transactions with affiliated enterprises were at arms’ length and no transfer pricing adjustments were to be made. Pursuant to that the AO passed a draft assessment order u/s 144C. The assessee filed a Writ Petition to challenge the draft assessment order. HELD upholding the challenge:

U/s 144C(1) the AO has to pass a draft assessment order in the case of an “eligible assessee” which is defined in s. 144C(15)(i) to mean any person in whose case the variation from returned income arises as a consequence of the order of the TPO u/s 92CA(3). As no transfer pricing adjustments had been made by the TPO, the assessee was not an “eligible assessee” and the AO had no jurisdiction to pass the draft assessment order.

Note: In Ericsson AB vs. ADIT the assessee, being a foreign company, would have continued to be an “eligible assessee” even though the TPO had not made any adjustments

Discover more from itatonline.org

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading