Download Center

You Have Requested The File: ACB_14A_Rule_8D.pdf
Contacting Download Site. Preparing File For Download. Please Wait...
Please enable pop-ups in your browser for this site. Problems? Use this alternate download link

Stay Up-To-Date With The Latest Developments

Latest Supreme Court Verdicts

  1. Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Limited vs. Bishal Jaiswal (Supreme Court) Under S. 18 an acknowledgement of liability signed by the party against whom the right is claimed gives rise to a fresh period of limitation. Under Explanation (b) to the Section the word ‘signed’ .....

  2. In Re: Expeditious Trial Of Cases Under Section 138 Of N.I. Act 1881. Chapter XVII inserted in the Negotiable Instruments Act, containing Sections 138 to 142, came into force on 01.04.1989. Dishonour of cheques for insufficiency of funds was made punishable with impriso .....

  3. DCIT vs. Pepsi Foods Ltd (Supreme Court) Judged by both these parameters, there can be no doubt that the third proviso to Section 254(2A) of the Income Tax Act, introduced by the Finance Act, 2008, would be both arbitrary and discriminatory .....

Latest High Court Verdicts

  1. Tata Communications Ltd vs. UOI (Bombay High Court) Although the respondents purport to contend that proper procedure had been followed, record does not bear that there had been any communication made to the petitioner as to its submissions being not a .....

  2. Teleperformance Global Services Private Limited vs. ACIT (Bombay High Court) The consequence of approved scheme of amalgamation was that amalgamating company had ceased to exist and on its ceasing to exist, it cannot be regarded as a person against whom assessment proceeding c .....

  3. Sadruddin Tejani vs. ITO (Bombay High Court) Before Hon’ble High Court, the Petitioner challenged the arbitrary and unreasonable action of the Designated Authority (Respondent No.2) in rejecting the declarationfiled under the DTVSV Act. It was .....

Latest ITAT Verdicts

  1. DCIT vs. Ozone India Ltd (ITAT Ahmedabad) To summarise, in our view, the issue of shares at ‘face value’ by the amalgamated company (assessee) to the shareholders of amalgamating company in pursuance of scheme of amalgamation legally reco .....

  2. Maria Fernandes Cheryl vs. ITO (ITAT Mumbai) As noted by the Central Board of Direct Taxes circular # 8 of 2018, explaining the reason for the insertion of the third proviso to Section 50C(1), has observed that "It has been pointed out that the .....

  3. Shiv Bhagwan Gupta vs. ACIT (ITAT Patna) The Assessing Officer has levied penalty @ 10% of the alleged undisclosed income, however, it is a matter of record in this case that the assessee has not made any surrender of any undisclosed income .....

Latest Useful Information

  1. Lecture Meeting: Decoding the New Reassessment Regime in light of the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court All India Federation of Tax Practitioners (Western Zone). Lecture Meeting on May 14, 2022 (Saturday) from 4.15 PM to 7.00 PM followed by Q&A (Login Starts @ 4.15 p.m. and Meeting Starts @ 4.30 p. .....

  2. Transfers Of ITAT Members (May 2022) Pursuant to the consultations with the two senior-most Vice Presidents, the following Members have, vide order dated 25th April 2022, been transferred in the same capacity to the respective Benches as .....

  3. Expert Panel has answered more than 750 questions on the Direct Tax Vivad Se Viswas Act, 2020 The expert panel consisting of Dr. K. Shivaram, Senior Advocate, CA. Rajan Vora and CA Pradeep Kapasi has answere .....

Latest Articles By Legal Luminaries

  1. Lecture Meeting: Decoding the New Reassessment Regime in light of the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court All India Federation of Tax Practitioners (Western Zone). Lecture Meeting on May 14, 2022 (Saturday) from 4.15 PM to 7.00 PM followed by Q&A (Login Starts @ 4.15 p.m. and Meeting Starts @ 4.30 p. .....

  2. Transfers Of ITAT Members (May 2022) Pursuant to the consultations with the two senior-most Vice Presidents, the following Members have, vide order dated 25th April 2022, been transferred in the same capacity to the respective Benches as .....

  3. Expert Panel has answered more than 750 questions on the Direct Tax Vivad Se Viswas Act, 2020 The expert panel consisting of Dr. K. Shivaram, Senior Advocate, CA. Rajan Vora and CA Pradeep Kapasi has answere .....

Latest Blog Posts

  1. The Curious Case Of The Tribunals: One Of The Finest Institutions Of The Judiciary Will Suffer On Account Of The Tribunals Reforms (Rationalisation And Conditions Of Service) Ordinance, 2021 Dr. K. Shivaram, Senior Advocate, has pointed out that the Ordinance defeats the decision of the Supreme Court in Tax Practitioners From Across The Country Salute The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Tax Practitioners from across the country salute the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal oldest Temple of Justice, which is considered as Mother Tribunal in India, on completion of 80years of its purpose .....

  2. Vision 2022: Expectation Of Stakeholders From The ITAT Dr. K. Shivaram, Senior Advocate, has made the fervent appeal, on the auspicious occasion of the 80th Foundation Day of the ITAT, that all stakeholders, namely, the Tax Bar, the Ld. Members, the CBDT .....

Latest Forum Discussions

  1. validity of notices u/s 148 The above notification clearly says the notice u/s 148 should be issued in the faceless manner through automated allocation. But the notices were found to be issued by AOs without being followed the p .....

  2. validity of notices u/s 148A It is observed that public are receiving large number of notices issued u/s 148A of the IT act asking clarifications on various financial transactions entered into by the assessees before the departme .....