| COURT: | ITAT Mumbai |
| CORAM: | Amit Shukla (JM), Sanjay Arora (AM) |
| SECTION(S): | 115JA, 115JB, 14A, Rule 8D |
| GENRE: | Domestic Tax |
| CATCH WORDS: | Book Profits, exempt income |
| COUNSEL: | D. V. Lakhani |
| DATE: | October 17, 2014 (Date of pronouncement) |
| DATE: | October 24, 2014 (Date of publication) |
| AY: | 2008-09 |
| FILE: | Click here to view full post with file download link |
| CITATION: | |
| Various arguments on the applicability of s. 14A & Rule 8D where the AO has not recorded satisfaction, where the shares are held in strategic/ subsidiary companies, held as stock-in-trade, where there are surplus funds and the quantum of disallowance under Explanation (f) to s. 115JA/ 115JB considered | |
(i) When it is said that rule 8D is mandatory (i.e., AY 2008-09 onwards), all that is meant is where the said expenditure cannot be reasonably ascertained with reference to the assessee’s accounts, toward which the AO is to issue …
HSBC Invest Direct (India) Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) Read More »
Recent Comments