COURT: | ITAT Mumbai |
CORAM: | Pramod Kumar (VP), Saktijit Dey (JM) |
SECTION(S): | Article 13(4) |
GENRE: | Domestic Tax, International Tax |
CATCH WORDS: | India-Netherlands DTAA, representative assessee, transperent entities |
COUNSEL: | Arpit Agarwal, Dhanesh Bafna |
DATE: | November 27, 2019 (Date of pronouncement) |
DATE: | November 30, 2019 (Date of publication) |
AY: | 2007-08 |
FILE: | Click here to view full post with file download link |
CITATION: | |
Law on taxation under DTAAs of "transparent entities" & "representative assesseess" explained: When an assessee is a representative assessee of a tax transparent entity, it is the status of beneficiaries or constituents of tax transparent entities which is relevant for the purpose of determining treaty protection (Linklaters LLP 9 ITR (Trib) 217 (Mum) followed) |
The principle emerging out of this analysis of legal position is that when an assessee is a representative assessee of a tax transparent entity, it is the status of beneficiaries or constituents of tax transparent entities which is relevant for the purpose of determining treaty protection. Viewed thus, this is beyond doubt that the income in question has actually accrued to the taxable entities on the Netherlands, which, according to the approach adopted by the Assessing Officer, is sine qua non for tax treaty protection. It would thus appear that the treaty protection has indeed been wrongly declined to the assessee
Recent Comments