Click Here For Best Books On Taxation & Law. Upto 60% Off On Select Titles. Free Shipping & Pay On Delivery!
 

Click Here To Subscribe To Our Free Newsletter

Home › All Judgements › CIT vs. Chhabil Dass Agarwal (Supreme Court)

CIT vs. Chhabil Dass Agarwal (Supreme Court)

Posted on by editor — 1 Comment ↓
COURT:
CORAM:
SECTION(S):
GENRE:
CATCH WORDS:
COUNSEL:
DATE: (Date of pronouncement)
DATE: August 19, 2013 (Date of publication)
AY:
FILE:
CITATION:

Click here to download the judgement (chhabil_das_147_Writ.pdf)


S. 147: Writ petition to challenge a reassessment order should not be entertained

The AO issued a notice u/s 148 reopening the assessment and pursuant thereto passed a re-assessment order u/s 147. The assessee filed a Writ Petition in the High Court to challenge the said notice and re-assesasment order. The High Court entertained the Writ Petition and quashed the re-assessment order. On appeal by the department to the Supreme Court HELD reversing the High Court:

The Income-tax Act provides a complete machinery for the assessment/re-assessment of tax, imposition of penalty and for obtaining relief in respect of any improper orders passed by the Revenue Authorities. The assessee cannot be permitted to abandon that machinery and to invoke the jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution when he has adequate remedy open to him by an appeal to the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals). As the said statutory remedy is an effectual and efficacious one, the Writ Court ought not to have entertained the Writ Petition filed by the assessee.

Note: This principle of alternate remedy ought not to apply to a case where the AO passes a reassessment order without following the GKN Driveshafts 259 ITR 19 (SC) procedure of passing an order on objections and waiting 4 weeks thereafter as held in Allana Cold Storage 287 ITR 1 (Bom.), Kamlesh Sharma ITO 287 ITR 337 (Del) & other cases

Related Posts:

  • CIT vs. Ram Kishan Dass (Supreme Court) The issue as to whether the amendment which has been brought about by the legislature is intended to be clarificatory or to remove an ambiguity in the law must depend upon the context. The Court would have due regard to (i) the general scope and purview of the statute; (ii)…
  • CIT vs. Pooja Agarwal (Rajasthan High Court) When the relevant documents are available the fact of transactions entered into cannot be denied simply on the ground that in his statement the appellant denied having made any transactions in shares. The payments and receipts are made through a/c payee cheques and the transactions are routed through Kolkata Stock…
  • Prabhat Agarwal vs. DCIT (Delhi High Court) It goes without saying that whilst the “reasons” shown to the court and the petitioner may ipso facto not be faulted, yet the file tells a different story; they were not recorded before the impugned notice was issued. In fact, the revenue played a subterfuge, in trying to cover up…
  • Usha Agarwal vs. ITO (ITAT Agra) The second point which is very important is that in regard to the cases falling under section 34(1A), action can be taken only where the income which has escaped assessment is likely to amount to Rs.1 lakh or more. In other words, it is only in regard to cases where…
  • Navneet Agarwal vs. ITO (ITAT Kolkata) The issue for consideration before us is whether, in such cases, the legal evidence produced by the assessee has to guide our decision in the matter or the general observations based on statements, probabilities, human behavior and discovery of the modus operandi adopted in earning alleged bogus LTCG and STCG,…
  • Ramprasad Agarwal vs. ITO (ITAT Mumbai) The assessee has produced the D-mat account and therefore, as on 18.06.2012 the assessee was holding 3,50,000 equity shares of M/s Rutron International Ltd. in D-mat account. This fact of holding the shares in the D-mat account as on 18.06.2012 cannot be disputed. Further, the Assessing Officer has not even…

Related Judgements

  1. CIT vs. Enron Oil & Gas (Supreme Court) 

    Where the assessee had entered into a production sharing contract with a consortium which was governed by section 42 of the Act and the assessee made contribution at a certain rate to the consortium whereas the expenditure incurred out of the said contribution stood converted on the basis of…
  2. CIT vs. Sarabhai Holdings (Supreme Court) 

    Where the assessee entered into an agreement for transfer of its industrial undertaking under which the buyer agreed to pay it interest on the unpaid consideration w.e.f 1.3.1977 and subsequently on 30.6.1978 the parties agreed to defer the date of commencement of interest to 1.7.1979 and the question arose…
  3. Vodafone International Holdings B.V. vs. UOI (Supreme Court) 

    The High Court’s finding that, applying the “nature and character of the transaction” test, the transfer of the CGP share was not adequate in itself to achieve the object of consummating the transaction between HTIL and VIH and that there was a transfer of other “rights and entitlements” which…
  4. CIT vs. Gujarat Flouro Chemicals (Supreme Court) 

    We have serious doubts about the correctness of the judgement in Sandvik Asia. In our view, the judgement in Modi Industries Ltd correctly holds that advance Tax or TDS loses its identity as soon as it is adjusted against the liability created by the assessment order and becomes tax…
  5. G. E. Veerabhadrappa vs. UOI (Central Administrative Tribunal) 

    As regards the allegation that the removal was motivated by “malice and personal vendetta”, the exchange of correspondence between the President and the Law Ministry regarding the transfers of the Members took place after the passing of the order dated 5.5.2012 curtailing the tenure of the Applicant till 31.8.2012….
One comment on “CIT vs. Chhabil Dass Agarwal (Supreme Court)”
  1. Narendra Lakhnotra says:
    August 31, 2013 at 5:10 pm

    Superb web Site for Proffesional Cource Students

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*