CIT vs. Ovira Logistics (P) Ltd (Bombay High Court)

Related Judgements

1. DCIT vs. Jyoti Ltd (ITAT Ahmedabad) 

   On perusing Section 43B(e), it is seen that interest on any loan or advance from a schedule bank, in accordance with terms and conditions of the agreement governing such loans or advance, would be allowed as deduction in the previous year in which sum is actually paid by the…

2. P. C. Joshi vs. UOI (Bombay High Court) 

   A Writ Petition was filed to challenge the levy of service-tax on advocates. It was claimed that an advocate renders services which cannot be said to be commercial or business like. They cannot be equated with the service providers mentioned … P. C. Joshi vs. UOI (Bombay High…

3. CIT vs. Ghatge Patil Transports Ltd (Bombay High Court) 

   Section 43B made it mandatory for the department to grant deduction in computing the income under section 28 in the year in which tax, duty, cess, etc. is actually paid. However, Parliament took cognizance of the fact that the accounting … CIT vs. Ghatge Patil Transports Ltd (Bombay…

4. ITO vs. Indore Steel and Iron Mills Ltd (ITAT Mumbai) 

   However, again, it cannot be denied that per the said decision, which is judicially binding on us, the hon’ble court has abundantly clarified that the deduction in respect of the employee’s contribution (to the employee welfare funds) in the hands of the assessee-employer is governed by the provision of…

5. CIT vs. M. M. Aqua Technologies Ltd (Delhi High Court) 

   In view of the Explanation 3C appended to Section 43B with retrospective effect from 01.04.1989, conversion of interest amount into loan would not be deemed to be regarded as actually paid amount within the meaning of Section 43B of the ActRead more ›