COURT: | Bombay High Court |
CORAM: | Akil Kureshi J, M. S. Sanklecha J |
SECTION(S): | 147, 68 |
GENRE: | Domestic Tax |
CATCH WORDS: | bogus share capital, bogus share premium, Reopening of assessment |
COUNSEL: | Jeet Kamdar, Percy Pardiwala, Sameer Dalal |
DATE: | March 7, 2019 (Date of pronouncement) |
DATE: | March 16, 2019 (Date of publication) |
AY: | 2011-12 |
FILE: | Click here to view full post with file download link |
CITATION: | |
S. 147 Reopening of Bogus share capital: Though the reopening is based on information supplied by the investigation wing, the reasons do not specify that the investment was non-genuine. The AO cannot reopen to investigate into the source of genuineness and creditworthiness of the investors as it falls within the realm of fishing enquiries which is wholly impermissible in law |
The reasons do not specify that the information supplied to the Assessing Officer by the Investigation Wing, suggested that such investment was non genuine. In this context, Assessing Officer refers to the requirement of verifying the genuineness of investor and requirement of further investigation. These observations would not further the case of the Revenue, these being no information with the Assessing Officer, prima facie, indicating that the investments were not genuine. The investigation into the source of genuineness and creditworthiness of the investor company would fall within the relam of fishing enquiries, which is wholly impermissible in law in the context of the reopening of the assessment
Recent Comments