COURT: | Bombay High Court |
CORAM: | Milind D. Jadhav J, Ujjal Bhuyan J |
SECTION(S): | 254(1) |
GENRE: | Domestic Tax |
CATCH WORDS: | principles of natural justice |
COUNSEL: | Dr. K. Shivram, Neelam Jadhav |
DATE: | January 30, 2020 (Date of pronouncement) |
DATE: | February 5, 2020 (Date of publication) |
AY: | 2007-08 |
FILE: | Click here to view full post with file download link |
CITATION: | |
S. 254(1): This manner of disposing appeals by the Tribunal is not expected of it and cannot stand to the scrutiny of law and justice. The Tribunal cannot refer to decisions on its own without giving the litigant an opportunity to distinguish it. This results in a breach of the principles of natural justice. It also cannot omit to deal with the decisions relied upon by the litigant. Not dealing with the cited decisions leads to the order being bad as an order without reasons |
The basic grievance of the Appellant is that the impugned order of the Tribunal has been passed in breach of principles of natural justice. This for two reasons, one the decisions relied upon by the Tribunal of its own (not cited at the bar) in the impugned order were not brought to the notice of the Appellant at any time, before the passing of the impugned order. This resulted in order adverse to the Appellant without the Appellant having an opportunity to address the Tribunal on the inapplicability of the decisions to the facts of this case. Thus, in effect an order without hearing
Recent Comments