| COURT: | Karnataka High Court |
| CORAM: | Dr. Vineet Kothari J |
| SECTION(S): | Commercial Taxes |
| GENRE: | Domestic Tax |
| CATCH WORDS: | costs, strictures |
| COUNSEL: | Raghuraman V |
| DATE: | September 24, 2018 (Date of pronouncement) |
| DATE: | October 5, 2018 (Date of publication) |
| AY: | - |
| FILE: | Click here to view full post with file download link |
| CITATION: | |
| Strictures: Court is pained by the manner in which the authority has passed the order just ignoring the applicable Notification and throwing it to winds. The said order is nothing less than suffering from malice-in- facts as well as malice-in-law. The responsible officer deserves to pay the exemplary costs for passing such whimsical order from her personal resources or by deduction from salary | |
this Court is surprised and is pained by the manner in which the authority has passed the impugned reassessment order in the second round of assessment for the period 01.04.0211 to March 2012 just ignoring the applicable Notification and throwing it to winds. The said order is therefore nothing less than suffering from malice-in- facts as well as malice-in-law. Therefore, the said responsible officer deserves to pay the exemplary costs for passing such whimsical order and the writ petition deserves to be allowed
Recent Comments