Click Here For Best Books On Taxation & Law. Upto 60% Off On Select Titles. Free Shipping & Pay On Delivery!
 

Click Here To Subscribe To Our Free Newsletter

Home › All Judgements › DCIT vs. Alcatel India Limited (ITAT Delhi)

DCIT vs. Alcatel India Limited (ITAT Delhi)

Posted on by editor — No Comments ↓
COURT:
CORAM: ,
SECTION(S):
GENRE:
CATCH WORDS: ,
COUNSEL:
DATE: November 25, 2014 (Date of pronouncement)
DATE: December 3, 2014 (Date of publication)
AY: 2003-04
FILE: Click here to download the file in pdf format
CITATION:
Transfer Pricing: ALP adjustments can only be made in respect of international transactions with the AEs and cannot extend to the transactions with non AEs

It is well settled legal position that the ALP adjustments can only be made in respect of international transactions with the AEs and cannot extend to the transactions with non AEs. There are large number decisions of the coordinate benches, including in the case of Alstom Projects India Ltd Vs ACIT [26 ITR (Trib) 322], holding so. In the case of CIT Vs Stratex Networks India Pvt Ltd (354 ITR 304), Hon’ble jurisdictional High Court has also accepted this position. Learned Departmental Representative, even as vehemently relying upon the stand of the TPO, does not dispute this legal position but he contends that the factual elements embedded in this contention, at least on computation aspect, need to be verified by the TPO. That is only arithmetical part giving effect to this principle. We see no harm in this exercise.

Related Posts:

  • Mitchell Drilling India Private Limited vs. DCIT (ITAT Delhi) It is elementary that the ALP is determined of an `international transaction’, which has been defined in section 92B of the Act. The term `transaction’, for the purposes of the Chapter–X containing transfer pricing provisions, has been defined in clause (v) of section 92F to include an arrangement, understanding or…
  • Atlas Copco (India) Limited vs. DCIT (ITAT Pune) In our considered opinion, where the payments are made to the entities/persons other than the persons specified in sub-section (3), the limitation period of one year from the end of financial year in which the proceedings u/s. 201 were initiated, as laid down by the Special Bench of Tribunal and…
  • Atlas Copco (India) Limited vs. DCIT (ITAT Pune) It is relevant to note the judgment of the Hon’ble Bombay High Court in Vijay Vishin Meghani Vs. DCIT & Anr (2017) 398 ITR 250 (Bom) holding that none should be deprived of an adjudication on merits unless it is found that the litigant deliberately delayed the filing of appeal.…
  • CLSA India Private Limited vs. DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) Section 92C(1) of the Act, contemplates that the arms length price in relation to an international transaction shall be determined by comparable uncontrolled price method; resale price method; cost plus method; profit split method; transactional net margin method or such other method as may be prescribed by the Board. Hence,…
  • Genpact India Private Limited vs. DCIT (Supreme Court) If the submission of the appellant is accepted and the concerned expression as stated hereinabove in Section 246(1)(a) or in Section 246A(1)(a) is to be considered as relatable to the liability of an assessee to be assessed under Section 143(3) as contended, there would be no appellate remedy in case…
  • DCIT vs. JSW Limited (ITAT Mumbai) In the light of the above discussions, we are of the considered view that rather than taking a pedantic view of the rule requiring pronouncement of orders within 90 days, disregarding the important fact that the entire country was in lockdown, we should compute the period of 90 days by…

Related Judgements

  1. Nokia India (P) Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Delhi) 

    (i) The assessee simply purchased mobile phones and accessories from Nokia group companies situated outside India and resold the same as such without any further value addition, mainly, to HCL Infosystems in India. Since the goods imported from the foreign … Nokia India (P) Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT…
  2. ADIT vs. M/s I. M. Technologies (ITAT Delhi) 

    In the light of the facts on record, on a consideration of the same we are of the view that the reliance placed on the data available in the public domain at the time of the assessment proceedings which was … ADIT vs. M/s I. M. Technologies (ITAT…
  3. EXL India Business Services Pvt Ltd vs. ACIT (ITAT Delhi) 

    The assessee filed the return of income of 29th October 2007, and that the time limit for issuance of notice, under section 143(2), selecting the case for scrutiny assessment expired on 30th September 2008. It is also an admitted position … EXL India Business Services Pvt Ltd vs….
  4. Toll Global Forwarding India Pvt Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Delhi) 

    The assessee followed the 50:50 business model of sharing residual profits in equal ratio with the service provider at the other end of the transaction i.e. at the consignee’s end in the case of export transaction and at consigner’s end … Toll Global Forwarding India Pvt Ltd vs….
  5. Tianjin Tianshi Biological Development Company Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Delhi) 

    (i) The DRP held that the determination of ALP is of no relevance in deciding the issue of suppressed sale by the assessee and went on to estimate the value of suppressed sale on account of difference between the value … Tianjin Tianshi Biological Development Company Ltd vs….

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*