ITO vs. Deepak Popatlal Gala (ITAT Mumbai)

DATE: March 27, 2015 (Date of pronouncement)
DATE: April 1, 2015 (Date of publication)
AY: 2010-11
FILE: Click here to download the file in pdf format
Addition towards bogus purchases cannot be made solely on the basis of statements of seller before sales-tax authorities. The AO has to conduct own enquiries and give assessee opportunity to cross-examine the seller

The AO was not justified in making the addition on the basis of statements given by the third parties before the Sales Tax Department, without conducting any other investigation. In the instant case also, the assessing officer has made the impugned addition on the basis of statements given by the parties before the Sales tax department. The CIT(A) has taken note of the fact that no sales could be effected without purchases. He has further placed reliance on the decision rendered by Hon’ble Gujarat High Court in the case of CIT Vs. M.K. Brothers (163 ITR 249). He has further relied upon the decision rendered by the Tribunal in the case of ITO Vs. Premanand (2008)(25 SOT 11)(Jodh), wherein it has been held that where the AO has made addition merely on the basis of observations made by the Sales tax dept and has not conducted any independent enquiries for making the addition especially in a case where the assessee has discharged its primary onus of showing books of account, payment by way of account payee cheque and producing vouchers for sale of goods, such an addition could not be sustained. The CIT(A) has also appreciated the contentions of the assessee that he was not provided with an opportunity to cross examine the sellers, which is required to be given as per the decision of Hon’ble Kerala High Court in the case of Ponkunnam Traders (83 ITR 508 & 102 ITR 366). The CIT(A) has analysed the issue in all angles and applied the ratio laid down by the High Courts and Tribunals in deciding this issue.

3 comments on “ITO vs. Deepak Popatlal Gala (ITAT Mumbai)
  1. seems revenue wants to shine at the cost of sales tax dept which dept even need to prove, before it could do revenue want to be an eagle without its own calibred investigation. long live new genre of revenue men…india shining!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *