| COURT: | Calcutta High Court |
| CORAM: | Biswanath Somadder J |
| SECTION(S): | 92B |
| GENRE: | Transfer Pricing |
| CATCH WORDS: | ALP, Transfer Pricing, Writ jurisdiction |
| COUNSEL: | Samaraditya Pal |
| DATE: | August 6, 2015 (Date of pronouncement) |
| DATE: | August 10, 2015 (Date of publication) |
| AY: | 2012-13 |
| FILE: | Click here to view full post with file download link |
| CITATION: | |
| S. 92B(1): If assessee contends that it has not entered into an "international transaction" with an AE, the TPO has to counter that by furnishing relevant information. Failure to do so can be challenged by a Writ Petition | |
When the petitioner no.1 replied to the said notice by its letter dated 29th April, 2015, the concerned respondent authority ought to have given a reply by supplying such relevant materials with which it come to a conclusion that the petitioner no.1 was an “associated enterprise” of PricewaterhouseCoopers Services BV. The reason why furnishing of such relevant materials were singularly important is that if the petitioner no.1 was not an “associated enterprise” of PricewaterhouseCoopers Services BV, there cannot be any computation of income from “international transaction” having regard to arm’s length price as envisaged under section 92 of the Income Tax Act, 1961
Recent Comments