M. G. Contractors Pvt. Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Delhi)

Related Judgements

1. Shubhmangal Portfolio Pvt. Ltd vs. CIT (ITAT Mumbai) 

   The assessee’s argument supra of the same being only a differential treatment of the very same, i.e., rental, income, so that there has been thus neither any concealment nor furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income, though appealing, is misconceived. The reason is simple. Yes, the assessee has apparently stated…

2. Suresh Chandra vs. ITO (ITAT Delhi) 

   The AO was required to first decide the objection of the assessee filed u/s 148 and serve a copy of the order on assessee. And after giving some reasonable time to the assessee for challenging his order, it is open to him to pass an assessment order. Since such…

3. ITO vs. Dipti Nikhil Modi (ITAT Mumbai) 

   The degree of proof necessary under the Explanation-1 to section 271(1)(c) can be discharged by the assessee by pointing out the factors and the material in his favour, because explanation merely raises a rebuttal presumption to which assessee can always discharge his onus by pointing out the factors relating…

4. Venus Financial Services Ltd vs. ACIT (ITAT Delhi) 

   It is settled position of law that in the case of sale, the Assessing Officer has no power to replace the value of the consideration agreed between the parties. A report of a valuer is an important piece of evidence and the same cannot be discarded without there being…

5. Hafeez S. Contractor vs. ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) 

   The notice issued by the AO u/s 274 read with section 271 of the Act at the time of initiation of penalty proceedings states that it is issued for “concealment of particulars of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income”. The assessing officer has not specified that as…