Click Here For Best Books On Taxation & Law. Upto 60% Off On Select Titles. Free Shipping & Pay On Delivery!
 

Click Here To Subscribe To Our Free Newsletter

Home › All Judgements › Pr. CIT vs. Shri Jai Shiv Shankar Traders Pvt. Ltd (Delhi High Court)

Pr. CIT vs. Shri Jai Shiv Shankar Traders Pvt. Ltd (Delhi High Court)

Posted on by editor — 4 Comments ↓
COURT:
CORAM: ,
SECTION(S): , ,
GENRE:
CATCH WORDS: ,
COUNSEL:
DATE: October 14, 2015 (Date of pronouncement)
DATE: October 30, 2015 (Date of publication)
AY: 2008-09
FILE: Click here to download the file in pdf format
CITATION:
S. 143(2)/ 292BB: Failure to issue a s. 143(2) notice renders the reassessment order void. S. 292BB saves a case of "non service" of the notice but not a case of "non issue"

The failure of the AO, in re-assessment proceedings, to issue notice under Section 143(2) of the Act, prior to finalising the re-assessment order, cannot be condoned by referring to Section 292BB of the Act. Section 292BB applies insofar as failure of “service” of notice is concerned and not with regard to failure to “issue” notice. The non-issue of the said notice is fatal to the order of re-assessment.

Related Posts:

  • JDC Traders Pvt. Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Delhi) If we accept the argument of the learned DR that u/s 154 of the Act, ld. AO is empowered to deal with the escapement of income in respect of which the reasons were not recorded even after the assessment reopened under section 147 of the Act is completed, it would…
  • CST vs. Shri Krishna Chaitanya Enterprises (Bombay High Court) The promoter has to maintain, safeguard and protect the property and look after the day-to-day wear and tear. Therefore, when he maintains the structure or repairs it, he is not rendering a taxable service in the sense envisaged by the Financial Act, 1994. If one loses complete focus or sight…
  • The Shri Saibaba Sansthan Trust (Shirdi) vs. UOI (Bombay High Court) It would be best if the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) carry out the necessary investigation on the above allegations and if there is truth in it, it would take corrective action on the same. This is particularly because this conduct alleged on the part of the CIT(A) and…
  • Shiv Raj Gupta vs. CIT (Supreme Court) The revenue has no business to second guess commercial or business expediency of what parties at arms-length decide for each other. For example, stating that there was no rationale behind the payment of INR 6.6 crores and that the assessee was not a probable or perceptible threat or competitor to…
  • CIT vs. Gopal Shri Scrips Pvt. Ltd (Supreme Court) The High Court failed to notice Section 506(5) proviso (a) of the Companies Act and further failed to notice Chapter XV of the Income Tax Act which deals with "liability in special cases" and its clause (L) which deals with "discontinuance of business or dissolution". The aforementioned two provisions, namely,…
  • Shri Dhar Sabha Vaishno Devi vs. CIT(E) (ITAT Amritsar) (Third Member) In the instant case, the Ld. CIT(E) denied the registration by observing that the head of the society is restricted to be from Shree Dhar Vansh and no other member of the Sabha will have any right to raise any objection. In my opinion that cannot also be a ground…

Related Judgements

  1. Pr. CIT vs. Tupperware India Pvt. Ltd (Delhi High Court) 

    The department’s contention that the judgement in CIT vs. Orient Craft Ltd. (2013) 354 ITR 536 (Del) is contrary to the Full Bench verdict in CIT-VI v. Usha International Ltd. (2012) 348 ITR 485 and the issue should be referred to a larger Bench is not acceptable because the…
  2. Pr. CIT vs. G & G Pharma India Ltd (Delhi High Court) 

    Without forming a prima facie opinion, on the basis of such material, it was not possible for the AO to have simply concluded: “it is evident that the assessee company has introduced its own unaccounted money in its bank by way of accommodation entries”. In the considered view of…
  3. Coperdion Ideal Private Limited vs. CIT (Delhi High Court) 

    The Court is of the view that, in a case where the assessment is sought to be reopened in 2009, four years after it was originally made, i.e. 2005, the mere fact that there was a judgment of the Supreme Court of 1997 which was not noticed by the…
  4. Global Signal Cables (I) Pvt. Ltd vs. DCIT (Delhi High Court) 

    In the reasons supplied to the petitioner, there is no whisper, what to speak of any allegation, that the petitioner had failed to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for assessment and that because of this failure there … Global Signal Cables (I) Pvt. Ltd vs….
  5. Nickunj Eximp Enterprises Pvt. Ltd vs. ACIT (Bombay High Court) 

    We would exercise our writ jurisdiction to interdict a proceeding under Section 148 of the Act seeking to reopen an assessment only when the same is clearly without jurisdiction and not otherwise as a matter of self restraint. We are … Nickunj Eximp Enterprises Pvt. Ltd vs. ACIT…
4 comments on “Pr. CIT vs. Shri Jai Shiv Shankar Traders Pvt. Ltd (Delhi High Court)”
  1. bobjee Kurien says:
    October 30, 2015 at 8:12 pm

    I am amazed that on this issue the matter had to be taken to the court.It is the basic requirement of law that a hearing notice has to be served on the asesessee before finalising an assessment. I recollect a case where the CIT Appeals did the same act . There was a group of about 50 cases and the same was represented by the same counsel. It was the month of March.He posted one case and the counsel asked for time He refused and went on to pass exparte orders dismissing all the 50 cases without posting the others.The ITAT passed strictures on the said CIT(A).The act needs to be redrafted !!!!!! IN the light of the directions of the board who is going to be questioned in the present case

    Reply
  2. dr.g. balakrishnan PhD ML says:
    October 30, 2015 at 9:29 pm

    Honorable court is right in its decision.

    i wonder whether AOs or revenue officers are really educated as the word education means ‘draw knowledge’ but what i find here is present day education is no education at all, if one goes by real meaning of education.

    Reply
  3. dr.g. balakrishnan PhD ML says:
    October 30, 2015 at 9:34 pm

    appears site is equally intelligent, when simple position is stated it needs what moderation god only knows?

    yesterday night when i posted on CBI arrests of It officers, a position on economics, site says duplicate post , my earlier posts were on law…i believe itatonline need to post right assistants to be receiving the posts, else our hours of work is just turned futile. sorry, dr sivaram, when i see today some novices seem sitting on computers.

    pls put right boys or girls on the computers .

    Reply
  4. dr.g. balakrishnan PhD ML says:
    October 30, 2015 at 9:41 pm

    Seems CBDT is not rightly manned by really competent officers that is the reason why all kinds of men are in revenue department,in fact it is meaninglessly taxing tax payers, i think hon courts award damages against the officers as also on the department lest tax payers are not meaninglessly offended.

    If the ministry of finance and CBDT are really strong there would be negligible corruption i believe in the revenue.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*